the tourist
Blue Crack Addict
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2003
- Messages
- 27,919
Well, one good thing about the song is that Bono's voice is better than it's been lately (and by lately, I mean the past 14 years or so).
Ok I just finally listened to it turned up loud in my car on my way to work. I like it even more now (and I already liked it a lot.)
Wow. What a disappointment.
Wow. U2 have finally, successfully become a vapid party band to compete with and for the young folks.
While I can recognize this as the same band that came up with "Elevation" and "Vertigo", I cannot believe this is the same band that made "Bad" and "I Still Haven't Found What I'm Looking For" and "Until The End of The World". Where did the class and maturity go? The striving for genuine spiritual and artistic transcendence? Were the '70s, '80s and '90s just a big fluke? Were those records rescued by the stellar efforts of in-their-prime producers who clearly no longer give a shit what this band does with itself?
You would hope that the guys that came up with The Joshua Tree in their 20s would be able to come up with something better than this empty tripe in their late 40s. You would hope that all of their experience would give them better taste. You would hope that their friends might step in and offer some needed criticism. I want to believe that if you let Bono listen to this song in 1987, he would have vomited and smashed the record to bits. I want to believe that this is a clever joke, like Bono's adoption of the "Fly" persona in '91.
But, the truth is, we're left with four middle-age guys trying desperately to be hip and have hit records that teenyboppers might buy instead of a new Justin Timberlake album (something that will never happen). Sadly, U2 have officially become the dads who try too hard to fit in with their kids' friends, and end up only embarrassing their own children until they won't even speak to them anymore.
And this is the song that is supposed to generate hype for the new album? This is a sad day, folks, so recognize it for what it is. What was once a beautiful and dignified career is coming to a screeching, shuddering halt with this empty, soulless bubblegum shit.
Wow. What a disappointment.
It does not however – not by a long, long, long, long shot – come close to matching the Achtung Baby singles for that perfect mix of commercial catchiness mixed with creative excellence and depth.
As I said, its just my opinion, but for you or anyone to defend it adds strength to my opinion, if it wasn't U2 singing it most people would ignore it, it wouldn't get anywhere chartwise, and would be totally ineffective in promoting the album, but because its U2, it will definetly go top 10,maybe even No.1, & the LP will go to No. 1. I'm not going out of ,my way to knock U2, for the sake of it, I've been a lifelong fan, & will continue to be so, but after such a long wait, & especially after, an at best patchy last album, I'm just left with such a huge feeling of anti-climax at this particular songs lack of anything special. Think of all the truly great U2 songs, of which there are many, and this doesn't come close to joining them, does it, really?
have i posted about the "sex as epiphany" brilliance of the lyrics to "elevation"?
the mole is the male member. start from there.
Well, one good thing about the song is that Bono's voice is better than it's been lately (and by lately, I mean the past 14 years or so).
*raises hand*
many many pages back, long before people started posting weird pictures of lathery african american men.
I mean they've never just tinkered with an obvious pop song have they?
This is the band who cut out some of the best songs they'd ever written to fit "A Trip through your wires" on Joshua Tree, wrote the Sweetest thing, Some days are better than others, Babyface, Discotheque all pretty straight forward party songs. I'm not the biggest fan of GOYB, while they've added some new bells and whistles they've essentially came up with a cross between discotheque, fast cars and salome. But if you think this is some radical departure for the band then you are dead wrong, they've been writing pop songs on and off for 30 years.
And as throwaway as GOYB it's 10 times as deep as Vertigo.
Essentially the song is serving it's primary purpose, it's a up-tempo song they can release with a cranked mix for modern radio.
Wow. What a disappointment.
I think Bono's voice sounds fabulous. Very crisp clean and clear.
I think Bono's voice sounds fabulous. Very crisp clean and clear.
And I mentioned this before, but I love the parts at .30 / .31 and 1:48. Is it some kind of guitar effect?
I like the "you don't know" bits - he sounds really great on those.
I do have one question though that seems to keep coming back to me....if we compare Streets or ISHFWILF to GOYB/Vertigo....there's such a big difference....and I think GOYB, in this case, is missing something that songs like Streets and ISHFWILF have...an epicness factor...Now, in terms of lead singles, where did this vibe go? I don't know...I'll agree that GOYB really doesn't sound like much else...but it has this cheap pop vibe to it in the same vein as Vertigo that is sort of off-putting...it seems like if NLOTH is a brilliant record, GOYB is going to be the low point...
I like the "you don't know" bits - he sounds really great on those.
Exactly.
The guitar on the last part is amazing in a good stereo system. wow.
Am the only one who thinks 'you don't know/how beautiful/you don't know how beautiful you are/you don't know/you don't get it do you/you don't know how beautiful you are' IS the chorus? I've heard people refer to the 'you don't know how beautiful you are' "parts", "bits", and so on, and I've heard a few people even say that they thought the song had no real instantly sing-along chorus. THIS is the chorus! And it's the most brilliant part of the song, imo. Surely I'm not the only one who views it as the chorus?
listen to the song and watch these smiles, kinda funny.