GirlsAloudFan
Blue Crack Addict
Wow.
Where did I ever say the Heat would win 70+ games? I do recall saying that at best they could.
Dude will you just give it a rest already? He quoted me specifically. And he was talking to me. I can only think he's referring to me when he follows a sentence up where he's talking. To me.
He was bad.I dont think he was that bad... he grabbed 7 rebounds in 16 minutes last night. Did all we can ask for defensively considering his size...
.
Joel Anthony (a defensive shutdown, that's who will be guarding Dwight Howard),
He was bad.
Why did he play only 16 minutes...not foul trouble, he had only 2. Because he couldn't stop anything...Shaq was eating him alive, but blew 3 layups, 2 right at jump street cause he was a bit too amped up wearing legendary Celtic green.
And remember you said this:
I can't wait to see how he handles Howard
So you're right, maybe I overlooked the fact that he's going to get knocked around defensively, but I dont think anyone was expecting any offense out of him anyways.
Unless, you know, he mentions who he's talking about in that exact post, as I said and he corroborated.Dude will you just give it a rest already? He quoted me specifically. And he was talking to me. I can only think he's referring to me when he follows a sentence up where he's talking. To me.
I hate to answer a question with a queston, but when did I ever say you specifically called a 70 win season? In my original post, I used the term "talking heads." In the followup, I said "70+ win prognosticators." Fuck's sake, man. You should be more worried about the fact that last night didn't show a lot of positives for the Miami Poorly Constructed Fantasy Team with No Bench than the fact that one Mavericks fan is looking forward to the idiots at ESPN being exposed as hyperbolic assholes.
For the sake of argument... it was the ECC Boston Celtics. Who got even better in the offseason.
A 74 win team finds a way to win that game. I'm not taking a dump on your team (I've got all season to do that), it's just going to be nice to see all the 70+ win prognosticators backpedal all day.
Unless, you know, he mentions who he's talking about in that exact post, as I said and he corroborated.
Let's all just be like some little Fonzie's and chill.
How am I not supposed to assume you're talking to me when you quote me, respond to my 'backpedaling' quote if you will (because lets be honest, what I wrote right there is justifying a loss more than anything else).
Explain to me... how am I not supposed to think you're talking to me? Especially when you erase the portion in my quote specifically saying 'not that I think this team will be a 70+ win team'?
I said what I want to say: you need to chill out.If you'd just say what you'd like to say rather than coming all at me with the sarcastic posting, maybe we could get along here?
because every dope on espn was asking if the heat can challenge the bulls single season win record leading up to last night, and now they're acting like they just found out the drop dead gorgeous supermodel they picked up at the bar is a tranny.
you're not the only one backpedaling...
I said what I want to say: you need to chill out.
Still doesnt explain to me why I'm automatically supposed to know he's not talking to me after he quotes me?
Yes, because employing sarcasm means I'm treating you like a dog.
Maybe you're just being hyper-sensitive?
Reading comprehension, man. I'll bet you're the only person here who misunderstood Imperor's post. And just because you quote somebody doesn't mean that everything you type under that quote is directed at that person. Example: I'm going to the store to buy cigarettes and Gatorade. I wasn't talking to you when I said that.
It doesn't matter if I treat you with respect or not, because you're just going to accuse me of somehow insulting you with innocuous comments, as evidence by your response to Impy's post.Sure as hell doesnt mean you're treating me with any kind of respect. Not that you owe me, specifically, any respect at all. Being respectful is common courtesy. Your mocking attitude doesnt feel nice, just letting you know.
It doesn't matter if I treat you with respect or not, because you're just going to accuse me of somehow insulting you with innocuous comments, as evidence by your response to Impy's post.
Shit, cat. I quoted you to respond to something you said, but that doesn't mean my comments were ABOUT you. Directed at? Sure. But I never explicitly lumped you in with the Woody Paiges of the world. You're not a victim. Stop whining.
Let's see, Impy posted something that pretty clearly stated it wasn't about you. Less than a month ago, you made this post:Whatever dude, all I've gotten from you since I started posting here was mockery and belittling.