Again, anyone with more detailed memories than me is welcome to jump in, but if there had been a smoking gun, we would have been hearing about it for the past year, rather than vague shouts of "Benghazi! Emails! Corruption! Pay to play! Seizures! Put her in prison!"
As I'm sure you know, Bill was impeached, and that came about after Starr's frustration about finding nothing on the Clinton's during Whitewater. I guess that depends on your perspective, if you think a president ought to be forced into publicly admitting that he received a beej in the Oval Office. In my opinion, the question never should have been asked, it was Republican obstructionism. But does any of that even have to do with Hillary?
The thing is, like I said about repeating lies, these things stick with low information voters, and becomes the gospel truth. And the media runs with them, because hey, a story! But there's nothing more damning in any of it, that I have seen, that hasn't been done by Republican administrations, and far worse in the case of GWB and his band of war criminals. How many emails did the GWB administration lose?
The fact that these discussions are even taking place when her opponent is someone truly corrupt, and with the temperament of a spoiled toddler is kind of mind blowing to me. But hey, that's fine, let's give him the security codes, when the world is on the brink of war, and he's up at 3 am tweeting missives during a coke binge. That scenario is much more comforting than unlikeable Hillary.
Eta - sorry if this comes off as a little ranty, Ashley. Not directed toward you at all, just my frustration with the election cycle and the recent turn of events with the FBI.