U2DMfan said:
Well, that's all well and funny, nonetheless......
To compare either of them to these crap versions of early, rough demos, I don't know.....maybe you are one of those daft guys who thinks The Joshua Tree sucks.
oh yeah, here ya go:
Ah, be carefule now, winky boy.
I think JT is great. I feel it's the best album of 1987 and one of the best of the 80's.
However, it has plenty of weaknesses and is overly praised by fans. I also feel annoyed by those that loved JT, but can't accept anything else U2 has done. I'm further perplexed by those that loved JT, but can't tolerate ATYCLB or HTDAAB.
JT has weaknesses - all of U2's albums do.
But must I stress again that based on these VERY EARLY OCEAN RECORDED versions of these songs, I'm not impressed. I fully acknowledge that what I'm hearing may change considerably. In fact, perhaps hearing the real studio recording of the exact same song may change my views. But even if I try to remove the background noise, I'm not hearing any advancement here. 409 has been proven not to be U2 - so that's gone. Of the rest, they sound either very U2 or outright boring ("Thank You"). ATYCLB was great - a fantastic departure from the 90's U2. HTDAAB seemed to advance on that sound, make it harsher and darker, while still keeping some of those softer elements that shined on ATYCLB. So I expect any future album to advance even further. R&H advance on JT. "Zooropa" advanced on AB. But so far, I'm not hearing this advancement - more of a full out regression.
If indeed this is the sound of the album, while I'll still happily buy it and probably still enjoy it, it may be the first time in ever that I might actually be disappointed in new U2. And I say this fully aware that we are hearing but a few songs. Other songs may truly shine. Heck, the songs we are hearing might not even make it on the album!
So there. Happy. Good. Now, back to me hating JT.