If they want to go with a 16 tracks compilation, why not The Rest Of The Best instead?
I mean, what's the point in repeating the same songs already featured on Best of 1980-1990 and "Best Of" 1990-2000?
Let's see:
1- Out Of Control
2- Gloria
3- Two Hearts Beat As One
4- "40"
5- A Sort Of Homecoming
6- Bullet The Blue Sky
7- Running To Stand Still
8- One Tree Hill
9- God Part II
10-The Fly
11-Lemon
12-Mofo
13-Please
14-Elevation
15-City Of Blinding Lights
16-Original Of The Species
You can notice that even making any single disc compilation of nothing but stuff that didn't appear on the 2 Best ofs is STILL INCOMPLETE an lack songs !!! .
Songs like 11 O`Clock Tick Tock, The Electric Co, Fire, A Celebration, Seconds, MLK, In God's Country, Who's Gonna Ride Your Wild Horses, Zooropa, original or single versions of Numb, Discotheque, Staring At The Sun, If God Will Send His Angels, Last Night On Earth, Walk On, Vertigo and Sometimes You Can't Make It On Your Own MAKES A SECOND DISC REST OF THE BEST !!!!
... and they want to make a compilation repeating tracks from Best of 1980-1990 and "Best of" 1990-2000?
Are they deaf, blind or what?
Come on, they aren't newbies, they don't need to fill a crappy "Greatest Hits" with whatever comes to mind for the bucks, they are professionals ... and any compilation must reflect that !!
I really hope people from U2 team here have a read at this topic, try to see fans way and talk the band to stop this nonsense intended for a "new" Greatest Hits and suggest them to release something decent at last, a 3 or 4 CD Singles and Promos or at least a 2 CD The Rest Of The Best. Any other compilation, specially any single disc compilation will be just s***