Zoomerang96
ONE love, blood, life
who the fuck eats KFC with a knife and fork? wtf?
mr pitt, elaine's boss.
who the fuck eats KFC with a knife and fork? wtf?
I feel Obama has been so far ahead of the GOP it's not even fair.
Must be in response to Drumpf being a dick to Paul Ryan.
So Drumpf is speaking in Green Bay on Friday
Even with the Trump primary wins starting?They figured they would win, obviously.
If he eats at Kroll's, I don't want to know, because then I'd never be able to set foot in there again.
#obligatoryGreenBayreference
But given how awful the GOP have been through Obama's presidency they have no one to blame but themselves.
Tim Huelskamp, Kansas representative and tea party darling, lost his primary yesterday 56-44%. He was a Cruz backer and staunch NeverTrump guy. Lost to a pro-Trump obgyn Doctor.
Very interested to see what happens with the Paul Ryan - Nehlen primary next week.
Could get Cantored in Brexitish surprise.
Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
He'd probably hate the fact that he wouldn't even get a plate for his food!
It is discomforting to read the things people say about Hillary on the internet.
There are right-leaning people who genuinely believe Obama and Hillary are leading a movement to eventually transform the US into a Stalinist regime where the government controls everything and individual liberty doesn't exist anymore.
There are people on the left(well, actually, probably everywhere on the spectrum) that call our two-party system a corporate duopoly, there is no difference, it's all one party, and they all report to the same corporate masters, and Hillary won't do much of what she's promising because her corporate masters won't let her.
I say the former is insane right-wing paranoia, while the latter is an exaggeration of a truth.
The former is insane is because a Stalinist regime, a full-on socialist or even communist state, requires that the government be in control over much, much more than what the American Left wants. We want like three things - healthcare, education, and the social safety net - that have anything to do with any kind of socialistic principles. And yes, we want to raise taxes on the wealthy to pay for it. You know what we don't support? Suppression of free speech, the government running all the media, the government owning all of the means of production of the goods we buy(cars, food, clothes, housing, whatever), etc etc etc. Maybe you can make the argument that we want to use ideas from certain current European social democracies, but there is no argument to be made that anyone wants an actual socialist or communist government. Fuck's sake.
The latter is an exaggeration of the truth because, while it's true that corporate America has an absolutely troubling amount of control over both political parties, and that there are certain things that aren't likely to change until that control is lessened, to argue that there's no difference at all between them when one of them wants to at least try to do something to combat gun violence and the other won't lift a finger, when one of them wants to treat illegal aliens like human beings and the other wants to unceremoniously toss them all out, when one acknowledges climate change and the existential threat it poses while other continues to mock the issue, when one wants to try to solve the problem of so many uninsured people while the other spits on those solutions and offers none of their own, when one doesn't want to let religion dictate stripping gay people of their rights and one does, etc etc, is to willfully bury one's head in the sand.
And yes, I'm aware that last paragraph was actually one monster run-on sentence.
I mean your simple answer about people believing Obama and Clinton want a "Stalinist regime" isn't a serious discussion. People who believe this have nothing more than a C average high school knowledge of world history and government. They don't know what that means. They're just sheeple who replay lines they've heard before, and equate left to social to socialism to communism to Russia to enemy. Not worth a discussion.
Worst president ever11!!!!!11!!
Sent from my iPad using U2 Interference
The Republicans really shat the bed with the Garland nomination. I don't think that they necessarily thought they would win the Presidency but they have a blind, irrational hatred of Obama and if he had nominated Reagan's corpse they wouldn't have allowed a vote. Additionally they felt good about down-ticket races due to their own gerrymandering. So even if Hillary won, they could block her nominees like the obstructionists that they are.
Now, Obama should oblige them and Hillary should nominate somebody like Pam Karlan, a Stanford law prof and lesbian, incredibly intelligent woman that would give the GOP fits. They deserve that type of nominee.
Three lesbians on one court?!?!?
If Obama doesn't pull Garland, he's a fucking idiot.
...
Clinton is going to win, let's enjoy her pick and not some needless moderate that's only been brought forward as a political tool.
So, you would want somebody on the court that agrees with the conservative side some of the time?
So, you would want somebody on the court that agrees with the conservative side some of the time?
Go. Absolutely go. I would if the opportunity presented itself... who doesn't stop and gawk at a good car crash?So Drumpf is speaking in Green Bay on Friday and I'm thinking about going just as a social experiment.
What's funny is that basically all GOP senators and the governor (Fuck Scott Walker) are not showing up. Must be in response to Drumpf being a dick to Paul Ryan.