Moser
Refugee
Well, Katy Perry just fell to rise of The Joshua Tree on the US iTunes. Should be retitled to "Songs on Ascent".
I did hear 'Raised By Wolves' on the Spectrum (XM channel 28) today.
Upon first and only listening until the CD comes along. I don't see the hype . Not sure it's better than the 00's albums just because it might be thematically stronger.
It's a bizzare mix of two halves. The opening 4 songs trying (desperately, even for U2's standards) to be accessible and then it goes dark starting with Iris. Magic is ok opener (Invisible should have gotten the job though) and California is the first peak of the album, that's how pop is done right and done good, unlike EBW and Song for Someone, good verses ruined by terribly forced choruses. The stretch from Iris to Cedarwood Road is one of their best ever. But then it sinks, most of all with utterly forgettable Sleep like a baby tonight (worst song of the album) and snooze inducing final two songs. They need more Edge and hopefully they will really go all out with DM on Songs of Experience.
Highlights : Iris, California and Volcano
Upon first and only listening until the CD comes along. I don't see the hype
This album has a collection of songs that are the most emotional I've ever heard from a lyrical standpoint and instrumental standpoint. Its actually quite a sad album to listen to..it sounds like a farewell album, each song talking about the progression of their lives and each song taking a piece of their last 12 albums and dispersing it throughout. I hear Boy, October, TUF, JT, R&H, AB, Zooropa, Pop etc....Its their farewell album. A double album of not hit singles but songs that could only be heard side by side.
93.3 WMMR in Philadelphia has been playing cuts from SOI from the moment it was released. I believe they have played every song and continue to rotate the new songs between their regularly programmed tracks.
yesterday I heard "Sleep Like a Baby" while driving home
I did hear 'Raised By Wolves' on the Spectrum (XM channel 28) today.
I heard 'The Troubles' on the Spectrum yesterday evening.
Until the CD comes along? You think that's going to make the music better somehow? What are you listening on?
Or are you one of the 90% of the people on the internet who think they can tell the difference between high bit rate compressed music and lossless, when in fact less than 5% of the population actually can?
Magic is ok opener (Invisible should have gotten the job though)
Upon first and only listening until the CD comes along. I don't see the hype . Not sure it's better than the 00's albums just because it might be thematically stronger.
It's a bizzare mix of two halves. The opening 4 songs trying (desperately, even for U2's standards) to be accessible and then it goes dark starting with Iris. Magic is ok opener (Invisible should have gotten the job though) and California is the first peak of the album, that's how pop is done right and done good, unlike EBW and Song for Someone, good verses ruined by terribly forced choruses. The stretch from Iris to Cedarwood Road is one of their best ever. But then it sinks, most of all with utterly forgettable Sleep like a baby tonight (worst song of the album) and snooze inducing final two songs. They need more Edge and hopefully they will really go all out with DM on Songs of Experience.
If ATYCLB was a strong first half that sizzled this is a very strong middle section (Iris-C.Road) tanked by one of their worst final three songs and so-so opening (two good and two bad songs in the first four like Bomb).
Highlights : Iris, California and Volcano
I agree. It has this crazy dichotomy of being both bright and energetic, but with this sort of heaviness, sadness or maybe resignation in it's undercurrent.
I am very much looking forward to Songs of Experience. Because if it turns even darker, grittier and with even more sadness, I am ALL IN. That's what I've been dying for from this band for 15 years. I'm through with the Love, Peace, save the world BS. LOL.
a lot of people would probably disagree with you re those last three songs. You must be a younger fan, and not into the 90's stuff, because Sleep is as close to Zooropa and Pop as you'll get, and The Troubles is up there with Love is Blindess in terms of atmosphere and vibe. This Is Where....has incredible energy too.
California is a good song, but one of the more obvious attempts at mainstream pop. So can't agree with you there either. EBW is the better song.
I know for a fact that I can tell the difference between lossless and 320 mp3, and most musicians can, too. That's why they hate mp3s, and most prefer vinyl. Just because some people have shitty hearing doesn't mean everyone does, and that stat you refer to has as much validity as a poll during an election campaign.
If you haven't done a blind A/B test, you don't know it for a fact. You may think you do, but you don't. And you know better than to make a blank statement like this...even if you know what to look for and can tell the difference, whether you can actually spot an difference is going to be dependent on different variables, crucially the type of music being compressed.
But I'm not talking about musicians or people who listen to music for a living and know what to look for in compressed music. I'm talking about the average listener. But yes, if you can consistently tell the difference between high bit rate compressed music and a CD in a blind A/B test, congratulations, indeed you either listen to music for a living and know exactly what you're looking for, or you have hearing in the top % of people in the world. I'm not doubting that this doesn't apply to you, Hollow Island, but it doesn't to the vast majority of listeners, including those who insist they can tell the difference. And it's just not having great hearing...it's knowing what to listen for in compressed music.
The same goes for people who insist they can spot the difference between a 720p TV and an identical 1080p on, say a 42" TV from a 10' distance. Most people just can't do that, but most people will insist they can if you say "This one is higher resolution...can you tell the difference"?
It's a fairly common phenomena, and if you Google it you'll find there are countless examples of this, even among audiophiles and videophiles...people who insist they have magic ears and eyes, but when it's a genuine blind test, disappointingly, they don't.
And yes, this record has been mastered by iTunes, so your point there is well taken but any differences you hear in the mastering of the CD are going to be very, very subtle. Vinyl is of course a different story, that's analog. But my point is that listening to this on CD isn't going to transform the music, unless your objection to it is specifically with the mastering itself...and even then, the vast majority of people won't be able to tell the difference, especially on everyday home and car stereos and ear buds that the music will mostly be played on.
Do you really think that people won't hear a difference between the itunes mp3s and a CD? It's entirely possible that the album will be compressed beyond belief and will sound just as poor, but I think that differences will be noticed it it's mastered well, even if they're just noted at a subliminal level.