US 2008 Presidential Campaign/Debate Discussion Thread - Part III - Page 19 - U2 Feedback

Go Back   U2 Feedback > Lypton Village > Free Your Mind > Free Your Mind Archive
Click Here to Login
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-31-2007, 03:27 PM   #361
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 11:23 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by deep


Conservatives would not vote for Bloomberg

they would vote the GOP ticket.
edit to inform people why Bloomberg is very, very far from conservatives

He is considered a social liberal, who is pro-choice, in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage and an advocate for stricter gun control laws.



Quote:
In 2001, the incumbent mayor of New York, Rudy Giuliani, was ineligible for re-election, as the state limits the mayoralty to two terms. Several well-known New York City politicians aspired to succeed him. Bloomberg, a lifelong member of the Democratic Party, decided to run for mayor as a member of the Republican Party ticket.

Voting in the primary began on the morning of 11 September 2001. Later that day, because of the World Trade Center September 11, 2001 attacks, the primary was postponed. In the rescheduled primary, Bloomberg defeated Herman Badillo, a former Congressman, to become the Republican nominee. Meanwhile, the Democratic primary did not produce a first-round winner. After a runoff, the Democratic nomination went to New York City Public Advocate Mark J. Green.

In the general election, Bloomberg received Giuliani's endorsement. He also had a huge spending advantage. Although New York City's campaign finance law restricts the amount of contributions which a candidate can accept, Bloomberg chose not to use public campaign funds and therefore his campaign was not subject to these restrictions. He spent some $73 million of his own money on his campaign, outspending Green by five to one.[19] One of the major themes of his campaign was that, with the city's economy suffering from the effects of the World Trade Center attacks, it needed a mayor with business experience.

In addition to being the Republican nominee, Bloomberg had the ballot line of the controversial Independence Party, in which "Social Therapy" leaders Fred Newman and Lenora Fulani exert strong influence. Some say that endorsement was important, as Bloomberg's votes on that line exceeded his margin of victory over Green. (Under New York's fusion rules, a candidate can run on more than one party's line and combine all the votes received on all lines. Green, the Democrat, also had the ballot line of the Working Families Party. Bloomberg also created an independent line called Students First whose votes were combined with those on the Independence line). Another factor was the vote in Staten Island, which has traditionally been far friendlier to Republicans than the rest of the city. Bloomberg crushed Green in that borough, taking 75% of the vote there. Overall, Bloomberg won 50% to 48%.

Bloomberg's election marked the first time in New York City history that two different Republicans had been elected mayor consecutively. He is considered a social liberal, who is pro-choice, in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage and an advocate for stricter gun control laws.
__________________

deep is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 03:30 PM   #362
Blue Crack Supplier
 
martha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Orange County and all over the goddamn place
Posts: 42,555
Local Time: 12:23 PM
Yeah, but you'd think (hope) that Dems would figure out the whole "independent, but really just a spoiler" thing and not vote for him, then.

eta: Especially after that idiot Nader and his idiot followers put Bush in the White House.
__________________

martha is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 03:38 PM   #363
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 11:23 AM
The Dems are not the biggest problem

there is a large portion of the electorate that are independents or "decline to state" on their party affiliation

in a fairly evenly divided country - these voters are key

these are the voters that can swing either way and tip an election

in 08 they were expected to vote Democratic, this is what many of them did in 06

Bloomberg could be attractive to them, they could see it as no longer a choice between A or B

but a choice between A, B, or C

but C will not win
deep is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 03:46 PM   #364
ONE
love, blood, life
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Tempe, Az USA
Posts: 12,856
Local Time: 12:23 PM
I'm sending Brother Bloomberg some diamondbucks to support him and Cindy McKinney too

dbs
diamond is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 03:48 PM   #365
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
2861U2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: watching the Cubs
Posts: 4,258
Local Time: 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by diamond
Cindy McKinney too

dbs
Right. She's another one that could end up taking away votes from Hillary. If McKinney and/or Bloomberg and/or Paul run as independents, the Republicans might just pull this off.
2861U2 is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 03:51 PM   #366
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 41,232
Local Time: 02:23 PM
Pretty sad if you have to depend on an independent to take away votes... But then again that's how you guys won back in 2000.
BVS is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 03:52 PM   #367
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 28,170
Local Time: 03:23 PM
There's always messing with voting machines and voter fraud
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 03:57 PM   #368
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
2861U2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: watching the Cubs
Posts: 4,258
Local Time: 01:23 PM
The Republicans will still need all the votes they can get, though. I certainly wouldnt put it past the Clinton people to go around slashing some tires on election day.
2861U2 is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 03:58 PM   #369
Blue Crack Addict
 
MrsSpringsteen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 28,170
Local Time: 03:23 PM
Actually I heard Hillary has put out hits on all non-Hillary voters. That's what shrews like her do.
MrsSpringsteen is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 03:59 PM   #370
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 03:23 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by 2861U2


Right. She's another one that could end up taking away votes from Hillary. If McKinney and/or Bloomberg and/or Paul run as independents, the Republicans might just pull this off.
Ron Paul is going to siphon votes away from Hillary? His constituency of immigration-hating, quasi-libertarian, anti-tax, pro-life, anti-governmental institutions in general, disenfranchised white men are suddenly going to see the light and vote for him when they would have originally voted for "it takes a village" Hillary?

What universe is this in?

Just because Paul is anti-war doesn't mean he'll get the left's votes.
anitram is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:01 PM   #371
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 41,232
Local Time: 02:23 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by 2861U2
The Republicans will still need all the votes they can get, though. I certainly wouldnt put it past the Clinton people to go around slashing some tires on election day.
I saw you mention this earlier, is this something you heard Rush say?
BVS is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:02 PM   #372
BVS
Blue Crack Supplier
 
BVS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: between my head and heart
Posts: 41,232
Local Time: 02:23 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by anitram

What universe is this in?
I often wonder the same thing...
BVS is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:02 PM   #373
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 11:23 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar
Pretty sad if you have to depend on an independent to take away votes...
do you remember in 2004
how the GOP was funding and fighting to get Nader on as many state ballots as possible?


anyways, back to Bloomberg

I think he would put Florida safely in the GOP column

also he could effect Mass and NH. possibly Ohio and what does he do in NY

and as I said before
flip only a couple of states

and that is the whole ball game
deep is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:05 PM   #374
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
2861U2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: watching the Cubs
Posts: 4,258
Local Time: 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by anitram


Just because Paul is anti-war doesn't mean he'll get the left's votes.
Yes, that's true. But I think he would take more votes from the left than the right, though. I can't picture a whole lot of pro-war people voting for him even if they agree with everything else he says. I could be wrong.
2861U2 is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:05 PM   #375
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 03:23 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by deep
anyways, back to Bloomberg

I think he would put Florida safely in the GOP column

also he could effect Mass and NH. possibly Ohio and what does he do in NY

and as I said before
flip only a couple of states

and that is the whole ball game
I agree re: Florida, and Ohio is probably ugly. The rest, he'll siphon votes away but I don't think he'll actually effect a difference in result. The bigger issue than the end result in my view will be that the more states you put into play, the thinner you have to stretch your budget and suddenly you're fighting for real estate that should have been yours easily. That can have a lot of negative impact long term.
anitram is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:06 PM   #376
Rock n' Roll Doggie
Band-aid
 
2861U2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: watching the Cubs
Posts: 4,258
Local Time: 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by BonoVoxSupastar


I saw you mention this earlier, is this something you heard Rush say?
No.
2861U2 is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:07 PM   #377
Blue Crack Addict
 
anitram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY
Posts: 18,918
Local Time: 03:23 PM
Quote:
Originally posted by 2861U2


Yes, that's true. But I think he would take more votes from the left than the right, though. I can't picture a whole lot of pro-war people voting for him even if they agree with everything else he says. I could be wrong.
But you can imagine Hillary voters voting for him?? Seriously, on what planet? He stands for virtually everything in 180 degree opposition to her platform.
anitram is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:10 PM   #378
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 11:23 AM
Quote:
Originally posted by 2861U2
The Republicans will still need all the votes they can get, though. I certainly wouldnt put it past the Clinton people to go around slashing some tires on election day.

I think they have a master plan to take out the GOP nominee

here is step one

Quote:
Would-be Ford assassin freed from prison on parole

Sara Jane Moore released on parole from federal prison in California

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- One of the women who tried to assassinate President Ford 32 years ago was released on parole Monday from a federal prison in California

, according to a Bureau of Prisons spokesman.

Sara Jane Moore, 77, was released in the morning from the federal women's prison in Dublin, outside San Francisco

, according to Mike Truman of the Bureau of Prisons.

There was no immediate comment from the prison facility, where Moore had been Inmate No. 04851180. Officials said she had a recent parole hearing, but they did not know what prompted her release. - really?

Nor was it clear what her plans are or where she is headed. really?
deep is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:25 PM   #379
Rock n' Roll Doggie
 
BonosSaint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,566
Local Time: 03:23 PM
BonosSaint is offline  
Old 12-31-2007, 04:26 PM   #380
Blue Crack Addict
 
deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: A far distance down.
Posts: 28,601
Local Time: 11:23 AM
Quote:
In the general election, Bloomberg received Giuliani's endorsement.

He also had a huge spending advantage. Although New York City's campaign finance law restricts the amount of contributions which a candidate can accept, Bloomberg chose not to use public campaign funds and therefore his campaign was not subject to these restrictions.
He spent some $73 million of his own money on his campaign, outspending Green by five to one.

Bloomberg won 50% to 48%.


Rove = Guiliani


Guiliani = Bloomberg


Bloomberg = Rove master plan for GOP win
__________________

deep is offline  
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Design, images and all things inclusive copyright © Interference.com
×