trojanchick99
Rock n' Roll Doggie FOB
well, it's official.
Memphis and I are engaged.
Super late to the party but congratulations!
well, it's official.
Memphis and I are engaged.
(the one with the Christian fish and the feet...I thought I was so clever).
maybe they can send some decorators down to the Jersey Shore for a make-over
Don't take this wrong -- I'm not saying gay marriage has anything in common with pedophilia. However, it's disingenuous to act like a disgust for pedophilia is somehow inherent in humanity. It's certainly been acceptable in cultures of the past. Pederasty in Greek culture is the most easily cited example.
That is true, and the Ancient Egyptian pharaohs married brother and sister.
...that neither is good for society or the individuals involved.
Just for the record - that is the same logic that conservative Christian and Jews use to oppose gay marriage.
Corbett compares same-sex marriage to incest
This is what happens when you make it legal for natural gas companies to elect a governor.
That was the first thing I noticed!The guy on the bottom of frame is a goddamn liar
Just for the record - that is the same logic that conservative Christian and Jews use to oppose gay marriage.
no it isn't.
Whether you think they are genuine or not is another discussion, but they routinely say something along these lines:
1) gay marriage undermines the society by destroying the traditional family structure, a structure God designed. (Society)
2) homosexual activity damages a person physically, emotionally, and spiritually - as it is being willfully disobedient to God (Individual)
Again, you can disagree with these statement, I'm not going to defend them. But these are the basic arguments that the conservative Christians and Jews use to oppose gay marriage.
I think the difference is that those opposing incest and polygamy have actual facts to back up their assertions that it damages the person and society.
Again - I'm not defending
I may get this wrong, I don't spend much time in here (anymore) reading everything in here.
But, when I read these types of things thrown into the argument, discussion it just makes the one doing it appear like they are bias against gay people.
The purpose to muddy up the discussion to defend bias towards gays.
That's the take away.
Again - I'm not defending these activities, but it seems like there is an appeal to scientific "facts" and I would like to see those.
Because the state doens't recognize polygamous marriage, the first wife is a spouse and all subsequent wives are single women and single mothers.
I think this is a huge potential financial burden on the state.
This may be more difficult to prove (assuming consensus).To say nothing of any social issues.
Oh man. The polygamy thing again.