LemonMelon
More 5G Than Man
No it's not.
Especially when one of them is MLK, which barely even registers as its own track.
No it's not.
Trapped
i want to make it clear that i wasn't complaining about "static setlists". they haven't been THAT static, certainly not for u2's standards.
certainly after following some other bands' setlists (blur, radiohead, massive attack, etc.), u2 certainly aren't alone in not changing up everything night by night.
He opened the show with that when I saw him last year.
Carry on.
Holy fuck. It's not that those who defend the band have arguments without merit, it's that they don't have any points! They just get mad at people who criticize them. Like you - getting mad at critics, but even you admit that the sets could be better. Which is my point. They could be better, and to say otherwise without saying why the current show is as good as can be, or good enough, is retarded. As for going to a show, it is highly likely that I am going to sell my ticket. Then again, a lot could change in the next 3 months.
So gutted UC isnt getting played any more.
I completly agree that the setlist hasn't yet fit the stage. I think the second night in Amsterdam got really close minus one or two songs.
I'm just tired of those that come on here and pretend that U2 haven't done static list all their career, or ignore that they've made more changes so far than PopMart, or act like static setlist effect them, they effect the small percentage that go to two or more shows...
the house doesn't go nuts during Unforgettable Fire and Ultra Violet either which are 2 songs already thrown in there for the more die hard U2 fans
even though they both sound amazing they dont get the same reaction as Elevation, Vertigo etc
even Stuck in a moment seemed to get the crowd more involved
the house doesn't go nuts during Unforgettable Fire and Ultra Violet
even though they both sound amazing they dont get the same reaction as Elevation, Vertigo etc
even Stuck in a moment seemed to get the crowd more involved
i want to make it clear that i wasn't complaining about "static setlists". they haven't been THAT static, certainly not for u2's standards.
certainly after following some other bands' setlists (blur, radiohead, massive attack, etc.), u2 certainly aren't alone in not changing up everything night by night.
Well, there's the problem right there.
fuck me... elevation, stuck in a moment, walk on ALL in the same show?
that's just flat out gross. there are more songs from atyclb being played than there are in total from the 90's combined. fucking brutal.
Oh noez U2Qz playingz sonz from an zalbum i sdont like !2232`¬¬!
While I'm sure that at this point most of the crowd really isn't familiar with TUF or UV[...]
Their 90s stuff is objectively better than atyclb and htdaab.
I don't entirely agree. How the majority of the crowd couldn't own a copy of Achtung Baby is beyond me.