HelloAngel said:Both. They've mastered both areas equally and beautifully.
Salome said:they will be remembered as a studio band
the number of people who have heard their album work on the radio/bought one of their albums etc is far bigger than the number of people who have seen them live/bought the live video's
Salome said:they will be remembered as a studio band
the number of people who have heard their album work on the radio/bought one of their albums etc is far bigger than the number of people who have seen them live/bought the live video's
wertsie said:Live...why is this not a poll?
david said:This question doesn't even need to be asked.
U2girl said:
Is it the end of the world if it's a question instead?
scatteroflight said:Studio, because that is what will remain after the tours and the band itself are over for good. I would argue that albums like Joshua, Achtung and ATYCLB will have more of an impact in the long run than the memories of tours like ZooTV and Elevation. And yes, I think this is probably true for almost all bands. Led Zeppelin was reportedly an unbelievable live act--I saw Page and Plant a few years ago, and that was plenty amazing enough--but do people go on more about the '71 tour (or whatever) or Led Zeppelin IV?
verte76 said:
You've got a point. The live shows last two or so hours, the tours end.....I mean, hell, I didn't know what kind of live band Zeppelin was because I never saw them live. But they made some kick butt music and that's still there for us to hear. Ditto with any other band. Still, I think any really good books about any of these bands will have plenty of live pictures of them. They're not exactly going to leave that out.