U2DMfan
Rock n' Roll Doggie VIP PASS
Why not poll FYM on the merits of the God of Abraham?
Deal with all 3 of them at once.
Deal with all 3 of them at once.
I'm sorry, but none of us really know. .
Being an atheist/agnostic seems to be another kind of problem for quite a few religious people, altogether.
The results are getting pretty evenly split, people must be randomly guessing
Other posters here hold the same ideas as I do, but according to your scheme aren't religious. If there was a mild mannered Mormon in FYM would they be less religious than Diamond? By the same token are private Christians not religious? Your charge of religiousity has nothing to do with my ideas and everything to do with me taking enjoyment in argument, a character trait that isn't always wedded to religion.If you're religiously atheistic, like the starter of this poll, it's even more entertaining.
Going by the portion who believe a man can fly I'd bet on overestimated.Or could it be that you underestimated the people of FYM?
The only religious atheists I can think of are people who don't believe in God but retain a cultural connection to their religion, I am not one of those people.
The results are getting pretty evenly split, people must be randomly guessing
No, I see it as 1/3 that Christ was divine
Non of those teachers wise as they were claimed to have DNA from God the Father, could take upon the sins of the world nor rose from the dead.
<>
If you're religiously atheistic, like the starter of this poll, it's even more entertaining.
But if you have chosen a particular spiritual path, yet you admit that none of us really know the truth, doesn't that make you inherently agnostic and merely hopeful that the spiritual path you have selected is the right one.....?
Another superficially appealing statement which on closer inspection becomes meaningless.You're as dogmatic in your atheism as any Christian here.
Yeah, because people die for Coca-Cola and give up centuries-old traditions for it, etc.
Right.
Think about it, A_Wanderer. Those who followed Christ saw him crucified on a cross among criminals. They saw him nearly beaten to death before that. They saw him give up his last breath. They saw their hope buried. They felt defeated.
Then, as the Gospel accounts tell us, they saw him again — alive. They saw him with his wounds. They saw him eat broiled fish (Nice detail included there.)
.
.
Nice post co, but you forgot the honeycomb part:
24:41 And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat?
24:42 And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb.
Honeycomb - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
24:43 And he took [it], and did eat before them.
I think the reason why Christ ate in His immortal glorified ressurected state was not that He was hungry, but He knew if would be recorded-and later people couldn't dismiss it as "ghost" or "spiritual appariation" of Christ.
This would then nullify untrue hypotheses proposed by random atheists and other people on the internet 2000 years later.
<>
When someone puts the resurrection on youtube I'll buy it, otherwise it's just possibly the greatest lie in history.
o.k, Thomas..
I have no doubts.
just possibly the greatest lie in history
you don't seem absolutely certain.
<>
I have no doubts about the resurrection. I am 100% convinced it did NOT happen.
You were quoting me on the magnitude of the lie - I couldn't think of a bigger lie, hence the 'possibly', I'm open to hearing about a bigger one.
I'm certain that A_W was expecting option #3 to receive the overwhelming majority of votes. 33-18 thus far.
Or you could boil it down to no vs. yes.
No - 35
Yes - 16
Thanks for the clarification.
We'll all find out soon enough for certain.
<>
Nobody can be absolutely certain, there is always the possibility - however remote - that a claim is true.
Or you could boil it down to no vs. yes.
No - 35
Yes - 16
Nobody can be absolutely certain
: