Next Album Rumours Thread III - The Gospel of Adam

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Hello everyone! I am popping in from my long hiatus. Post-election, I took a break from all things I became too obsessed with during the election. Hence the sabbatical.

Loved reading through months worth of this thread.

Few things I'll comment on that I can think of...

SFS is a terrible song. Yet surprisingly 13 is a fantastic song.

Headache is right about Rubin. I blamed him for a long time. But people get bad advice all the time, and it was the band's fault that they, for whatever reason, took his criticism/advice about "songwriting" to heart. I think ol' Rick's production credits on Window In The Skies, is about all you need to know of how badly he was paired with the band. Just bad.

EBW is also a fantastic song. I don't get the negative feelings people have for it. I think when you know all of the background of the song, sometimes it really warps your view. I think if that song came out as the lead single from SOI, and they had never played versions of it live prior to that, and we had no idea who had produced it, people would have been gushing over how good it was, especially coming off of No Line.

I really like this Doxxer guy. Glad to see a new face with good knowledge and well thought out opinions.

That said, since there was a lot of reflection on SOI and SOE, I agree with a lot of what Doxxer said. Also his list of skip songs on the last several albums mirrors mine almost exactly. I'd probably add a couple more :)

I think SOI has aged a bit better for me. SFS really is the only skipper for me. And I skip about 4 songs each (sometimes more) on ATYCLB, Bomb and No Line.
If The Crystal Ballroom had been the first song on the album, and the second single, and EBW had been the lead single, and Miracle was just a middle of the album non-single track, and they ditched SFS, it would be a damn near perfect U2 album. Sleep Like a Baby, and The Troubles being huge highlights, with the rest being in the very good range.

SOE would take a little more repair. I think the opener and closer are perfect. But leave off Get Out, American Soul, and The Showman. Add in Book of Your Heart and use the St. Peter's String version of Lights, and it would be a much stronger album. Huge highlights for me being Red Flag, Summer of Love, Little Things and Landlady. With the rest being in the very good range. I still really like Best Thing. And as much as I like Little Things, there is always something nagging at me when I listen to it, that something is just... missing. That it could have been something greater. Still an awesome song.

As for moving forward. I think the best thing would be if they actually did go in and tear through the recording process and then just let it be. But we know that won't happen. So second best would be to stick with 3 producers - Andy Barlow, Flood and Jolyon Thomas.
Obviously it's been said a million times, they need to bury the idea of shoehorning "hits" into a record. But really. REALLY. They need to embrace their age and wisdom. Just live in that moment, this time that they are in. Forget the love, and grace, and peace, and politics and feeding the world. Go inward, reflect. My hope would be darker more somber songs with palpable atmosphere, where you could almost feel the room they are creating it in.

They need that sort of... what now... third of forth chapter of their career. The final chapter, and go out as respected statesmen of rock, and have your name mentioned more with the Cohen's and Cash's of the world than the Nickelback's.
 
Last edited:
Coldplay will be elder statesmen of the last of the stadium bands by the time they’re “elder” and will probably be remembered for their mid career going back and forth with severe hits and misses. I think everyday life was all they needed, and they got it. Now all they’ve got to do is not pull a U2.
 
It’s going to be very interesting to hear how they speak about the last album/tour cycle when they start speaking to the press again.

They know what they’ve lost.
 
I might just be acting cynical to prevent my own disappointment if we don't hear anything new in 2022, but:

Is it possible with the backlog of tours - both those that were meant to happen in 2020/2021, and those planned for albums released in 2020/2021 - that there's actually less chance of U2 touring, simply because there won't be enough room/demand for them alongside the delayed tours by other acts?

(I admit I don't know how this works, so maybe it's not an issue, but it just occurred to me)
 
I think your concern can be alleviated somewhat in knowing that U2 are at smallest an arena enlist, and I highly doubt many acts are gearing up to reschedule their massive world tours in arenas or stadiums right now. Most of the reschedules are the medium and small venues right now.
 
I think your concern can be alleviated somewhat in knowing that U2 are at smallest an arena enlist, and I highly doubt many acts are gearing up to reschedule their massive world tours in arenas or stadiums right now. Most of the reschedules are the medium and small venues right now.

I hadn't thought of that! That does give me a little bit of hope.
 
I think your concern can be alleviated somewhat in knowing that U2 are at smallest an arena enlist, and I highly doubt many acts are gearing up to reschedule their massive world tours in arenas or stadiums right now. Most of the reschedules are the medium and small venues right now.



Not true. Pearl Jam has yet to reschedule their US arena dates from 2020 but have for the UK. Rage Against the Machine and Roger Waters have rescheduled their arena dates for this summer. Foo Fighters just made their 25th Anniversary Tour into a 26th Anniversary to start this summer. GNR have announced additional dates on their now-summer stadium and festival tour. Metallica are playing a handful of festivals.

Still to be rescheduled? The Rolling Stones had a 15-date stadium trek planned for last summer, no new dates yet. Springsteen had a tour planned to start spring 2021. Neil Young + Crazy Horse were set to announce a tour just as COVID hit.

Only of the only major legacy rock acts that haven’t mentioned a postponed tour or an upcoming one is U2.
 
Last edited:
So I know a thing or two about this - and arenas are filling up and filling up fast. There's zero doubt about that. There are a slew of unannounced tours that are already booked, on top of yet to be rescheduled dates that were contracted prior to the pandemic.

There are actually a lot more arena acts than most people realize.

That said - U2 have two things going in their favor.

First, there's only a handful of acts left on the planet that can fill stadiums by themselves globally. There's a few more acts who can fill stadiums regionally, or can fill them in the largest markets only - but very few who you can rely upon to fill most stadium dates across the globe and until proven otherwise U2 are still on that list.

Second - it's U2. Arenas are desperate for revenue after the last 15 months. Organizations that own these buildings have lost billions in revenue over the course of the pandemic. Live Nation bled money (not that anyone feels sorry for them).

They'll find a way to squeeze a sure thing in if the opportunity presents itself.

If U2 wants to tour, they'll tour. It's a guaranteed paycheck for everyone involved.
 
Last edited:
Not true. Pearl Jam has yet to reschedule their US arena dates from 2020 but have for the UK. Rage Against the Machine and Roger Waters have rescheduled their arena dates for this summer. Foo Fighters just made their 25th Anniversary Tour into a 26th Anniversary to start this summer. GNR have announced additional dates on their now-summer stadium and festival tour. Metallica are playing a handful of festivals.

Still to be rescheduled? The Rolling Stones had a 15-date stadium trek planned for last summer, no new dates yet. Springsteen had a tour planned to start spring 2021. Neil Young + Crazy Horse were set to announce a tour just as COVID hit.

Only of the only major legacy rock acts that haven’t mentioned a postponed tour or an upcoming one is U2.
I'm a tad antsy for PJ to announce their rescheduled dates. They just started pushing the festival in Jersey again, and will be doing Eddie's festival in San Diego in the fall as well - so I'm hoping for a fall announcement soon.
 
Second - it's U2. Arenas are desperate for revenue after the last 15 months. Organizations that own these buildings have lost billions in revenue over the course of the pandemic. Live Nation bled money (not that anyone feels sorry for them).

They'll find a way to squeeze a sure thing in if the opportunity presents itself.

If U2 wants to tour, they'll tour. It's a guaranteed paycheck for everyone involved.

Do they want to, though, without a new album? We know Live Nation forced convinced them to tour in 2017 despite the album delay, could they exert that pressure a second time?

I wonder what is actually in their contract, and if they're required to tour at least every 3 years or something like that.
 
Do they want to, though, without a new album? We know Live Nation forced convinced them to tour in 2017 despite the album delay, could they exert that pressure a second time?



I wonder what is actually in their contract, and if they're required to tour at least every 3 years or something like that.
I don't believe there are any mandates in the contract. But live Nation also owns whatever the hell the combined Maverick / Principle Management team is called now. So if live nation wants to put pressure on em, they certainly have them by the short and curlies.
 
So I know a thing or two about this - and arenas are filling up and filling up fast. There's zero doubt about that. There are a slew of unannounced tours that are already booked, on top of yet to be rescheduled dates that were contracted prior to the pandemic.

There are actually a lot more arena acts than most people realize.

That said - U2 have two things going in their favor.

First, there's only a handful of acts left on the planet that can fill stadiums by themselves globally. There's a few more acts who can fill stadiums regionally, or can fill them in the largest markets only - but very few who you can rely upon to fill most stadium dates across the globe and until proven otherwise U2 are still on that list.

Second - it's U2. Arenas are desperate for revenue after the last 15 months. Organizations that own these buildings have lost billions in revenue over the course of the pandemic. Live Nation bled money (not that anyone feels sorry for them).

They'll find a way to squeeze a sure thing in if the opportunity presents itself.

If U2 wants to tour, they'll tour. It's a guaranteed paycheck for everyone involved.


Would definitely believe arena shows are becoming easier to fill if only because people consume more music than ever before, or at least “more people are famous” by different avenues. Or whoever you want to put it.

I won’t pretend I knew that the arenas were filling up fast, but I would say that this post still reflects my sentiments. The larger the show, the less likely there is to be limited supply of venue.
 
I don't think Foo Fighters are appropriate there either. They are wonderful. But Coldplay I'll agree with.

Eh, Foo's have been playing the same song for the last 3 albums now. They have become about as bland as Get Out of Your Own Way played on repeat.

They are a solid rock band, but just not my thing.

It's hard to make a real comparison with U2, just because no other band that I can think of has had the type of career that they have. They started too late to have the god-like status that only 60's and 70's rock bands can claim (Zeppelin, Stones, Beatles, The Who, etc...) Along with the fact that they have never fit neatly into any genre - Not alt/indie enough, not classic rock enough, not pop enough. They just never fit in. They were always their own little island in a way.
Then throw on top of that the fact that they shifted their genre/sound drastically over the years. Again, can't really think of any band, especially of their stature that veered into so many different musical territories. And let's face it. No other band has been together as long as they have with the same lineup and continue to put their all into releasing new albums. Not just doing tours with an album once and a while as an afterthought.

That's why my hope is that they have a sort of Renaissance, ala Dylan, Cash, Bowie, etc... Notice these are all individual artists. It's definitely harder for a band, especially in today's musical landscape of streams and youtube views to make the same sort of impact with a late or career closing gem of an album. But to give us a stunning, personal, beautifully crafted album, free of "hits!"
 
Eh, Foo's have been playing the same song for the last 3 albums now. They have become about as bland as Get Out of Your Own Way played on repeat.

They are a solid rock band, but just not my thing.

With all due respect, if that’s really your opinion about the Foo Fighters, you really haven’t listened to their last 3 albums.
 
they certainly have them by the short and curlies.

giphy.gif
 
Hello everyone! I am popping in from my long hiatus. Post-election, I took a break from all things I became too obsessed with during the election. Hence the sabbatical.

been out in the wild.. do you live here - or is this a vacation?
 
Last edited:
I think SOI has aged a bit better for me. SFS really is the only skipper for me. And I skip about 4 songs each (sometimes more) on ATYCLB, Bomb and No Line.
If The Crystal Ballroom had been the first song on the album, and the second single, and EBW had been the lead single, and Miracle was just a middle of the album non-single track, and they ditched SFS, it would be a damn near perfect U2 album. Sleep Like a Baby, and The Troubles being huge highlights, with the rest being in the very good range.

I sequenced this strictly Danger Mouse/Epworth/Gaffney produced SOI which works really well for me. It flows extremely good and is pretty sonically cohesive all the way through (thanks to Gaffney's consistently involved fingerprints throughout - with both mixing & production credits). The Crystal Ballroom segues into Iris surprisingly well and has that (2 songs in 1) thematic feel of An Cat Dubh/Into The Heart where you could probably consider them a joint piece.

California, Lucifer's Hands, The Crystal Ballroom, Iris, Volcano, RBW, Cedarwood Rd, SLABT, The Troubles.

For this I actually omitted 'Reach Me Now' because IMO it's too up-beat to be wedged between the darker, meditative SLABT & Troubles and thematically it makes more sense for The Troubles to come after SLABT. I heard that's actually what the original track order had, where 'Reach Me Now' was originally the album's opener. So it's probably no co-incidence that SLABT flows so well into The Troubles, because they were originally meant to be together.
 
Last edited:
Yea that's what I'm expecting, but holding out hope for something sooner.

Alas... I guess I could always just truck it up to Jersey



And the push could further complicate already-booked shows any of us may have for next year. Miserable all around.
 
The next album has to be owned by The Edge. I don’t care if he plays his Explorer for every song, but just give us an original riff

SOI had better licks but nothing ever stuck with you. Maybe LolCano, which joking aside is probably his most Edge playing in a while.

No more trying to figure out if his delay will translate to acoustic. That’s never been U2

I don’t even care if the songs are upbeat or “faster”, just have Edge come up with interesting sounds again.
 
As far as guitar work, I'll say again that his punchy, staccato work on Reach Around is some of the best stuff he's done in the 21st century. Not really a hook or lick but it gives the song a lot of its energy and personality. Larry and Adam are superb on it as well; it's one of the rare recent songs where everyone seems to be firing on all cylinder.

And yeah, he did bring it on Volcano. Of course, it wasn't a live staple. And Reach Around was never played. As great as that tour was, it could have been even better. What's bizarre is that Raised By Wolves (which I love and also has some great, specific sonics from Edge) is a lot less catchy but had a permanent spot in the setlist because of the lyrical content.

There's also a wonderful minimalist solo on Sleep Like A Baby, and while I'm not as high on the RAWK of Cedarwood Road as some here are, at least he sounds like he's trying and it builds to a legitimate crescendo (which is why I think it works best as the penultimate track on the album if you move Reach Around to the top where it belongs).

I was listening to a Dirty Projectors album yesterday and suddenly had the urge to hear The Troubles right afterwards (the Angel Deradoorian connection, obviously), and while I've always had a problem with the ending of the track, it's not that the solo is too short (a longer one would be welcome, obvs), but that the fade-out is way too quick. Once they put the fade on the end, it's silent in less than seconds, and I just don't understand the aesthetic choice of not having your fade last longer. If you go back to Love is Blindness or Mothers of the Disappeared, for example, you'll hear a little more breathing room as the fades last at least twice as long and you get more of a feeling like the music is continuing on indefinitely even as it recedes from your ears. Same thing on With Or Without You.

I hope that makes sense.
 
Who are the guaranteed global stadium fillers?

U2
Stones
Springsteen
Taylor Swift
Beyoncé



... and .... ?


Metallica
Bon Jovi
Green Day


Who else?
 
Who are the guaranteed global stadium fillers?

U2
Stones
Springsteen
Taylor Swift
Beyoncé



... and .... ?


Metallica
Bon Jovi
Green Day


Who else?

I don't think I'd include Bon Jovi and Green Day. Regionally, perhaps. Green Day is headlining a stadium tour, but they're accompanied by Weezer and Fall Out Boy.

Garth Brooks would be on the list, at least domestically. I'm not sure of his pull globally.

McCartney.
AC/DC.
Coldplay did it fairly recently.
BTS was planning a stadium tour before the pandemic - not sure they have the staying power to do it long term but sure why not.
That... that's about it.

Maybe the reunited GNR.

Billy Joel, surprisingly enough, has done very well with domestic stadiums. A mix of baseball and football stadiums.

Same goes for Pearl Jam - who sell out Fenway, Wrigley and Safeco with ease but haven't really jumped into the football stadium show just yet.

It's a small list.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom