What's the worst review rolling stone has given to U2? 4 stars?
I seriously couldn’t tell you what this person is trying to say. Sounds like someone that just likes to hear themselves talk. Really randomly all over the place.
This. This is the music I wanted from U2 since Pop. Not experimental like the 90s but it sounds like they actually give a crap about making good music instead of the mediocre output of the last four albums.
Solid. Good stuff boys. Ive regained my faith in U2.
The Blackout
They're playing a live acoustic show in NYC in 20 minutes, because of course they are, because I don't live there anymore.
This. This is the music I wanted from U2 since Pop. Not experimental like the 90s but it sounds like they actually give a crap about making good music instead of the mediocre output of the last four albums.
Solid. Good stuff boys. Ive regained my faith in U2.
The Blackout
Those great reviews keep on coming. people love this record:
https://chorus.fm/review/u2-songs-of-experience/
“American Soul begins with Kendrick sarcastically rapping a reverse Sermon on the Mount, it's so potent and so immediate and Bono’s feeble lyricism following such a current talent is all the more painful."
Thought the above was an odd statement. Kendrick only speaks 2 lines in AS and I personally find nothing "potent" or "immediate" about them. I get the reviewer didn't like Bono's lyrics and that's fair, especially in this song, but to say Kendricks were some amazing lyrics and then Bono ruined it sounds just very weird to me.
“American Soul begins with Kendrick sarcastically rapping a reverse Sermon on the Mount, it's so potent and so immediate and Bono’s feeble lyricism following such a current talent is all the more painful."
Thought the above was an odd statement. Kendrick only speaks 2 lines in AS and I personally find nothing "potent" or "immediate" about them. I get the reviewer didn't like Bono's lyrics and that's fair, especially in this song, but to say Kendricks were some amazing lyrics and then Bono ruined it sounds just very weird to me.
An average 65 out 100 feels so unfair for such good effort as SOE is and some reviews are simply disgusting and vacuous.
I have to admit, though, that I have a morbid curiosity about "Bitchfork" rate. How much you bet they'll give to SOE?
It would be great if Pitchfork wanted to fuck with COS and Pretty Much Amazing for being Pitchfork wannabes and they gave U2 a great review to mess with their heads.
I can dream can’t I?
So will this end up their lowest metacritic rating? Despite the least amount of critics sourced? Seems unfair?
an average 65 out 100 feels so unfair for such good effort as soe is and some reviews are simply disgusting and vacuous.
I have to admit, though, that i have a morbid curiosity about "bitchfork" rate. How much you bet they'll give to soe?
We’ll see. If Rolling Stone and Entertainment Weekly gets on there it will be a good boost. Who knows about Spin. But probably decent.
Amazing that they use some of these dinky blog reviews but not ABC news, billboard, Variety, NPR, etc...