But aren't Coldplay and U2 currently "contemporaries" in a musical sense, just as much as U2 and the Bunnymen were contemporaries in the early 80s? As people in this thread have been quick to point out, the typical Coldplay "sound" is nothing like U2's earlier work, and is rather more like ATYCLB/HTDAAB. You can't blame them for wanting to work with Eno or Corbijn - they're both brilliant in their respective fields. Who WOULDN'T want to work with them?
I'm not defending Coldplay's music (I think most of it's rather crap, to be honest, and I can't stand Chris Martin.) I simply get irritated when I see people getting into a huff over bands imitating U2 or being heavily inspired by them, when U2 are just as guilty of the same things. Not that inspiration is really anything to feel guilty about in the first place. There are very few artists out there who have produced anything that is truly unique. It's only wrong when it's outright plagiarism.