Bleh!Bono's American Wife said:haha...you'll play again Paul
doctorwho said:Yay! I got a new low score: 37,730. I got lower than the 38K I saw posted earlier.
Anyone else get lower (and can prove it)? I did a snapshot of my screen (just in case ).
Even though it was my goal to get below that 38K score (as I think winning fast is as much a challenge as playing a nice long game and scoring 180K+), I've grown to enjoy this simple game. It is quite relaxing (especially since I know I can beat it ).
doctorwho said:[bBut I don't think I can ever reach your high, Zooholland. That's too long of a game for me. [/size] [/B]
cydewaze said:Ok, I don't understand. I just got lucky and beat the game in a very short amount of time, but my score is only 48,690.
In the past I've taken FAR longer to win, but my score was WAY higher.
Has anyone discovered the point to the scoring?
I wish I could read the rules. So far all I've figured out is that the little box on the right tells you how many tries you have left before the balls advance, and if you can get rid of a color before the balls advance, that color is gone for the rest of the game.anitram said:
I've won with a low score of 29,330.
The longer you play the higher the score b/c that's how it's set up.
But logic tells you that the faster you can beat it the better you actually are at playing it.
Stupid game.