chintito said:I'd like to see a return a 'dreaming it all up again'
ZeroDude said:Evolution 5?
Bono vs. The Edge pay per view wheelchair battles with soundtrack done by a computer who looks uncannily like Brian Eno.
jcool said:passengers part 2
no they didn't. i don't think the studio/building has even been built yet. There was a contest to see who would design the building and i think there was a winner, but no construction yet. U2 recorded the album at there old Dublin studios.onegin22 said:didn't they just build a ginormus multi-million dollar studio on top of a skyscraper in Dublin? And did they even use it for HTDAAB?
While I think this would be a cool idea. U2 is unlikely to do it for a number of reasons. U2 make money on their albums, but not that much. Record companies, retail units etc. take out a heafty slice. U2 make a great deal of money through touring and t-shirts. That's why we have to wait every 4 years between albums:iota said:What I would LOVE for them to do next would be quit these massive tours for a decade. Spend that decade traveling the world and recording maybe one album in Tokyo, one album in Iceland, one album in New York, one album in Africa
Sleep Over Jack said:After that, I think a folkier direction is probably the most likely direction.
adam3000 said:
But I have figured out the riddle. Evolution 5: Hip Hop U2 - Irish Gangsta's of Rythym
adam3000 said:
While I think this would be a cool idea. U2 is unlikely to do it for a number of reasons. U2 make money on their albums, but not that much. Record companies, retail units etc. take out a heafty slice. U2 make a great deal of money through touring and t-shirts. That's why we have to wait every 4 years between albums:
Year 1 and 2: Record Album and Release
Year 3 and 4: Tour 1 1/2 years and spend remaining time relaxing.
And Repeat.
They spend an extra amount of time developing their records so that they are good enough to promote over a 2 year span and lead off a tour that will bring in the real money.
Also, if U2 quit touring they might lose a bit of that live working out of that U2 sound that always helps cement the songs from their albums.
Sleep Over Jack said:Another thing to add, is that they've never done a double album...
That's what they are struggling with now. Bono says they want to be the Best Band in the World and still write great pop tunes. It's quite a balance they've yet to fully find a grasp on. I love all they're stuff. But I miss some of the adventure that died a little bit after POP didn't sell as well as they wanted it to.iota said:The question is....do they want the art or the money, because they can't sell the same thing to the same crowd forever.
adam3000 said:
This is a band who has sweated over included Mercy and Fast Cars on the album because they didn't want to have too much of a good thing. Joshua Tree was almost a double album. Some argue they should have done it then. I might agree. In any case I don't see a double album happening.
Yeah, I dont' know about that. Although I would like at least one side project in between albums to help tide me over in the 4 years spread (Yikes! that's a long time). Like Passengers or the Million Dollar Hotel Soundtrack. A way to balance U2 art/jazz experimental artistic growth and 4 minute song mainstream impluses.beau2ifulday said:I think if they gave up on always trying to be the biggest/best band in the world, we'd get alot more albums from them, with alot more better material on them.