http://www.goacta.org/Reports/defciv.pdf
I'm going to sleep and will have to defer any discussion until tomorrow, but I find this document to be simply disgusting.
Especially revolting are the various quotes that the paper claims to be indicative of the liberal point of view. These are so nauseating for one of two reasons: 1) The quote is either complete extremism ("I cheered when the Pentagon was hit") and not at all representative of the anti-war opinion in general. 2) Many quotes are at best, correct (in my opinion, of course), but at worst completely innocuous! ("We offer this teach-in...as an end to the cycle of global violence")
I've seen some trash since the attacks, but this ranks as the worst. I'd love to hear any debate--in the form of support, argument, or personal threat against my physical well-being
Melon, if you're around, could you chime in?
[This message has been edited by mug222 (edited 01-15-2002).]
I'm going to sleep and will have to defer any discussion until tomorrow, but I find this document to be simply disgusting.
Especially revolting are the various quotes that the paper claims to be indicative of the liberal point of view. These are so nauseating for one of two reasons: 1) The quote is either complete extremism ("I cheered when the Pentagon was hit") and not at all representative of the anti-war opinion in general. 2) Many quotes are at best, correct (in my opinion, of course), but at worst completely innocuous! ("We offer this teach-in...as an end to the cycle of global violence")
I've seen some trash since the attacks, but this ranks as the worst. I'd love to hear any debate--in the form of support, argument, or personal threat against my physical well-being
Melon, if you're around, could you chime in?
[This message has been edited by mug222 (edited 01-15-2002).]