ImNotSleeping
Acrobat
Yea it's not as if the night they're headlining is jam packed with new, fresh artists.
And I'd love to see night #1's show too.
Yea it's not as if the night they're headlining is jam packed with new, fresh artists.
I can't believe some of you have the chance to see U2 live and actually complain.
Maybe the entire LOLcano 2015-2016 tour will be full on acoustic.
I can't believe some of you have the chance to see U2 live and actually complain.
That song is like a fart.....
Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
I would pay money just to see the obsessive U2 freaks get beat up for pulling typical line shenanigans.
I can't believe some of you have the chance to see U2 live and actually complain.
What if you had the chance to see members of U2 having sex with everyone in your family right in front of you? How about the band clubbing a bunch of baby seals...in person? Would you watch? Or pay to watch? No? Well now we're qualifying whether or not seeing the band live is an absolute must-see.
I love the band, but don't want to see them without the sonic landscapes they can build with full power. I don't want to see them play ATYCLB in full. And I don't want to see them unless they have cheap GA seats.
These are all legitimate reasons for being uninterested in what would not be a typical U2 show.
What if you had the chance to see members of U2 having sex with everyone in your family right in front of you? How about the band clubbing a bunch of baby seals...in person? Would you watch? Or pay to watch? No? Well now we're qualifying whether or not seeing the band live is an absolute must-see.
I love the band, but don't want to see them without the sonic landscapes they can build with full power. I don't want to see them play ATYCLB in full. And I don't want to see them unless they have cheap GA seats.
These are all legitimate reasons for being uninterested in what would not be a typical U2 show.
What if you had the chance to see members of U2 having sex with everyone in your family right in front of you? How about the band clubbing a bunch of baby seals...in person? Would you watch? Or pay to watch? No? Well now we're qualifying whether or not seeing the band live is an absolute must-see.
I love the band, but don't want to see them without the sonic landscapes they can build with full power. I don't want to see them play ATYCLB in full. And I don't want to see them unless they have cheap GA seats.
These are all legitimate reasons for being uninterested in what would not be a typical U2 show.
No one's getting beat up because the typical concert attendee for this sort of thing is 14-17. .
14-17??
Even removing U2 from that lineup there is no way that its avaerage target audience is teenaged. Its targeting folks who were teenagers in 1994 not 2014.
I take it you're trying to be funny but this just strikes me as a bizarre reply.
Well, the thing is you see, to those of us who will likely never see them outside of a regular tour, and to someone who hasn't had the chance to see them indoors (save for travelling to another continent), your attitude just seems a bit spoiled.
I have nothing against anyone being disinterested, I just don't think you should complain. If you don't want to go, then don't.
Well, the thing is you see, to those of us who will likely never see them outside of a regular tour, and to someone who hasn't had the chance to see them indoors (save for travelling to another continent), your attitude just seems a bit spoiled.
I have nothing against anyone being disinterested, I just don't think you should complain. If you don't want to go, then don't.
Let's keep the discussion to ourselves on this discussion board, guys.
No one's getting beat up because the typical concert attendee for this sort of thing is 14-17.
People talk all the time about seeing 15 shows on a tour when most people here have trouble affording or finding a way to even see one. That sucks. That's also life.
I know it's a forum and all, I'm just really envious of the people who can actually go.
for their parents? Someone needs chaperones.
Look, I've never been to KROQ's AAX. But I have access to knowing what demographics attend the shows up on by it's sister station in the Bay Area, and I've been told the demo is the same for L.A. I'm not making this up. They sell tix to attract teens. Many of those teens also want to be able to say they saw the "greats" like the Pumpkins.
(GAF feverishly searching Orbitz and Kayak for the cheapest flight to Los Angeles)
, but using the image of the band having sex with my family was just a really, really strange way of making a point.
Are you envious because of the other bands + U2, or just U2? B
Because I don't get the mentality that IF U2 are playing then U2 MUST be seen. They don't tour that infrequently and this isn't even close to a full show. I love Bruce Springsteen, but I have next to no interest in seeing him when he's on his solo tours. Conditions are everything.
I know it's a forum and all, I'm just really envious of the people who can actually go.
And I don't consider myself sensitive, but using the image of the band having sex with my family was just a really, really strange way of making a point.
I bet Adam had a damn good time though.
How about the band clubbing a bunch of baby seals...in person? Would you watch? Or pay to watch?
No one's getting beat up because the typical concert attendee for this sort of thing is 14-17.
14-17??
Even removing U2 from that lineup there is no way that its avaerage target audience is teenaged. Its targeting folks who were teenagers in 1994 not 2014.
I take it you're trying to be funny but this just strikes me as a bizarre reply.
Well, the thing is you see, to those of us who will likely never see them outside of a regular tour, and to someone who hasn't had the chance to see them indoors (save for travelling to another continent), your attitude just seems a bit spoiled.
I have nothing against anyone being disinterested, I just don't think you should complain. If you don't want to go, then don't.