Lancemc
Blue Crack Addict
Well, much of what you were saying was pretty evident in terms of art vs. entertainment; I get all that and understand the danger of passing broad generalizations on any type of film.
You did say that Woo's best work was as worthy of discussion as certain past and modern masters, and as someone who saw The Killer in the theatre when it came out (and subsequently spent a lot of time in college hunting down all of his work), I just don't see it. I don't even know if I'd accord him the same attention as his other hero Peckinpah.
FWIW, I think Bullet in the Head stands pretty tall over everything else, though it's not going to made it to my 10 of the 90's. And I think Woo-maniac Tarantino has far surpassed him.
Well, fair enough I suppose. I just thought your distinction between genre-filmmaking and "serious film" or however you phrased it was maybe more dismissive than you meant. Though I guess we do agree that at their finest, the two can be one and the same, ala John Ford and we're merely as an impasse of tastes when it comes to be particular examples. Woo, like Tsui Hark also on my list, paints masterly broad emotional and ideological strokes with a certain kineticism and elegance, in bravura style... I think he offers some of the most vital and alive pure cinema the medium offers. Bullet in the Head is a great one that I think showcases his heightened emotional filmmaking at its most extreme. Likewise Hard Boiled features his most evocative action filmmaking (the teahouse shoot-out might be the most beautiful and purely cinematic bit of action I've ever seen films). The Killer I think is almost an impossibly perfect balance of all his sensibilities, and his most aesthetically interesting on top of it. Probably the most flat-out fun as well, plus that exceptional dramatic ending. We obviously disagree here too, but I'll take the three Woo films I mentioned here along with A Better Tomorrow over every film Tarantino's made.