RedRocksU2
Blue Crack Addict
Do you guys think that this will be released in Blue Ray? My other question is... what happens to the Claw now? Where will it be stored?
It's a confirmed rumor.
Do you guys think that this will be released in Blue Ray? My other question is... what happens to the Claw now? Where will it be stored?
^ lol!!!
Edge's LA snowglobe
Is this the thread where I can complain about the audience and performance from the Rose Bowl??
SHEFFIELD WAS BETTER!! by far
Do you guys think that this will be released in Blue Ray? My other question is... what happens to the Claw now? Where will it be stored?
I think he only had an LA one - but yes it was set out at all shows. I think it was something his kids gave him - in that each night while at work he had a pleasant reminder of his family.
There were [snowglobes] from each city. They clearly showed a Phoenix and Vegas one at their respective shows.
Edge is going to plop it down on top of his house in LA, on the mountains he destroyed.
Sorry if I'm spamming this question in 3 different threads, but I'm hoping to find someone that can help:
I have a question for people who attended the Rose Bowl Red Zone. Did you all receive your follow up email after the show that included the photo gift of the claw from the show? Not the Ticketmaster email survey, I received that one, but the other one with the photo I didn't get. Can someone post the photo here? I'd like to see it!
It's a confirmed rumor.
no, we didn't meet but I was about midsection RED1 (near the entrance) and 3-4 rows deep. I saw from another thread you said you were towards the front of the RZ at the rail. Anyway maybe we will still get those emails, I'll let you know if I get one...
did u already get seats for anaheim? I'm wondering what RZ will close at there. Considering the second rose bowl aucion closed at $555 I'm assuming Anaheim may end up somewhere around that unfortunately...
If they're smart they'll re-film this. Not a great show for them imo and it will rank fairly low on the overall U2 concert film scale. Like, maybe just ahead of Boston Elevation.
If they're smart they'll re-film this. Not a great show for them imo and it will rank fairly low on the overall U2 concert film scale. Like, maybe just ahead of Boston Elevation.
If they're smart they'll re-film this. Not a great show for them imo and it will rank fairly low on the overall U2 concert film scale. Like, maybe just ahead of Boston Elevation.
If they're smart they'll re-film this. Not a great show for them imo and it will rank fairly low on the overall U2 concert film scale. Like, maybe just ahead of Boston Elevation.
how are you basing this judgement?
Of course it will, it was never the intention that the webcast and DVD be the same. I'm kinda shocked that so many people are proceeding under this assumption.I do hope it's re-edited though.
On DVD it will probably be fine. Since the band clearly went to a lot of trouble and expense in arranging for a full scale crew and recording, they're bound to release it eventually. I do hope it's re-edited though. For me, the most thrilling moment of the concert I went to was when the Claw erupted with light during the intro for Streets, yet the Youtube Rose Bowl stream did indeed inexplicably cut to a terrible shot of an onstage cameraman! (What price on the audio being offered as a future U2.com subscriber gift?!)
Random question - have U2 ever commissioned a concert recording and not released the results? The most obvious one I'm thinking of is Milan 2005, which was only given a partial release. (I wouldn't class Dortmund 84 here, by the way. It was a TV broadcast that perhaps should've been on TUF remaster DVD, but the source wasn't commissioned by U2 themselves.)
One of the Dublin shows in 2005 (I want to say the third one) was fully filmed, but only for "archival purposes".
On DVD it will probably be fine.
Of course it will, it was never the intention that the webcast and DVD be the same. I'm kinda shocked that so many people are proceeding under this assumption.
Well speaking for myself I'm only talking about the quality of how the songs were performed, not the sound quality or what camera pans they decided to go with.
So on that count, unless they intend to do a bit of overdubbing...and I know they've done this in times past but this is a bit of a different situation...and this is why I say they should just leave the webcast as it is, a webcast, and refilm on another day..because there are a considerable number of areas that are candidates for 'fixing' with overdubs. It will end up sounding dramatically different and I'm not so sure that would be a good move.