Irishteen
Blue Crack Addict
U2 set to stay number one in the UK, they're ahead of Kelly Clarkson and Taylor Swift's new releases
U2 set to stay number one in the UK, they're ahead of Kelly Clarkson and Taylor Swift's new releases
Not to "jump the gun" but U2 is # 1 & 4 on the USA iTunes chart and Kelly is # 2.
On Amazon.com- U2 is #1 and Kelly is # 3
Its the 1st day, I know, but U2 was number #1 & 2 on Itunes on their 1st day of release and #1 on Amazon.com for the week/weeks leading up to their release.
Unfortunately, Kelly is on American Idol this Wednesday, so she should see a huge boost from that. Either way, not too bad....not too bad at all for now.
Schoolgirl Faryl Smith set to outsell U2 with debut album - Telegraph
I saw this article earlier and it frightened the life out of me! WHO or WHAT is this Faryl Smith? and PLEASE tell me the prospect of some 13 year old outselling U2 is nothing but garbage!
Schoolgirl Faryl Smith set to outsell U2 with debut album - Telegraph
I saw this article earlier and it frightened the life out of me! WHO or WHAT is this Faryl Smith? and PLEASE tell me the prospect of some 13 year old outselling U2 is nothing but garbage!
In the US, currently...
Clarkson #1, 4 on iTunes. #3, 16 on Amazon.
U2 #2, 6 on iTunes. #1, 56 on Amazon
I think Clarkson will pull it out but our guys are not going down without a fight....at least for now. 2 more "radio events" will hopefully help out but success may rest on "word of mouth" and if thats the case....Ill take it! I really feel this album has enough songs to make it stand out from the rest of the music out there. I can't wait for Magnificent to be released to radio.
I understand it has already been released to radio. However, I heard the commercial single will be released on May 1st, it really does not make sense to wait that long.
McGuiness needs to get shit together
If this is true it means TWO botched single releases.
McGuiness needs to get shit together
If this is true it means TWO botched single releases.
U2 are 3k ahead of Pig Face Clarkson in the UK
thats bad
Magnificent is supposed to be physically released on May 1. However, several U.S. stations have the single promo, or they are just playing album cuts, and the song is already rising fast on both Adult Rock and Alternative Music formats (see Boots thread).
In the U.S., to have a "Hit Single" on the Billboard Hot 100, U2 would have to maximize airplay and combine it with maximized downloads and physical sales.
I don't know how they can entice folks to download Magnificent as a "single" when it's already being downloaded at will as an album track...and physical sales are dead unless U2 puts out a couple of b-side gems.
That being said, I believe Magnificent is good enough to stand on airplay alone. It will be #1 on Triple A Radio within a few weeks and also in the Top 10 on Modern Rock/Alternative stations by then. Beyond that, it's just too hard to tell with U.S. radio. If Boots can be a "modest" hit, however, Magnificent should have much more potential.
regarding magnificent, it WILL need a radio edit (not sure about AAA formats, but for UK certainly). if thats the case, which version will people download? album or single mix? this will split sales and greatly reduce chart performance. from my understanding artists whose singles are short pop songs that dont need editing, are only available as one version - the album version - this means that sales arent split and higher chart performance.
THIS is why I think McGuiness (or whoever) is hurting the band's single numbers. GOYB could have been more successful if it wasn't split into different versions available on the regular and deluxe iTunes versions of NLOTH. You aren't going to get nearly as many downloads if you have three different versions of Magnificent available on iTunes that are #13, #14, and #15, then you would if you just had one version that was in the top 5 or 10
Why cant all versions of the one song just count as one though? All versions of NLOTH were added together as one. Why cant it be the same for singles?
They ARE combined in the final chart but not in the itunes chart. It's the same for albums on itunes
Basically what we'll have when Magnificent is released is this
Magnificent from No Line On the Horizon
Magnificent from No Line On the Horizon Deluxe
Magnificent from the Magnificent single
And they'll all chart separately on itunes
But if they add together for the purposes of the UK Top 40 and the US Hot 100 then does it really matter where it charts on ITunes?
But if they add together for the purposes of the UK Top 40 and the US Hot 100 then does it really matter where it charts on ITunes?
Because on the front page of itunes they show the top 10 singles at the moment, meaning extra promotion
If U2 have a single at 11 and 12, it should be in the top 10 but wouldn't be, meaning less people would see it and in turn buy it. Hitting the top ten on itunes is a form of advertising in a way
Sorry Doctorwho, I gotta agree with Irishteen on this one.
Millions of people log onto iTunes each day and the first thing they glance at is the top 10 downloaded songs. If there was ONE version of a U2 song that made it into the top 10 of iTunes, I believe it would draw the attention of a lot more people who didn't get on to iTunes for the express purpose of trying to find that song.
I think most people who log into iTunes don't get on thinking "OH! I need to go download this particular song right this instant!" They log in essentially to browse, and if they see a song in the top 10 from an artist they like, they are much more likely to check it out. Hence the song is likely to sell a lot more copies, charting higher and having more staying power just from the visibility of being RIGHT THERE on the front page, one click away. And if it's in the top 10...it must be good, right???