Movie Reviews Part the 12th: Does Gimli hate file conversions as well? Stay tuned!

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
OK, fair enough, for me Badlands and Days of Heaven almost come off as ordinary in comparison with TTRL-TNW-TTOL, in terms of storytelling. Though I suppose despite its tone-poemness (totally a word) TNW is fairly straightforward.
 
I found Badlands to actually feel more like a Malick film than DOH actually, but I'm not sure I could really tell you why.
 
8/10 The Company Men - Much better than I thought it was going to be, but I don't think too many people want to look at that reality. It's basically about how you can forget what's really important to you when you try and keep up with the Joneses.

9/10 Toy story 3 - A satisfying end to the series. I always hated how other kids roughly played with their toys. It's almost like they didn't have enough imagination. :D
 
Finally got around to seeing the Criterion of Kiarostami's Close-Up that my roommate let me borrow.

Very powerful stuff. Deceptively simple considering how much is going on in a meta-narrative sense.

Things got a little dusty here in the Laz household near the end of the film when the unexpected cameo happens.
 
How's the picture quality on the Criterion laz? I've been meaning to check it out.

And yeah, Purpleoscar, I watched The Company Men this week too and found it to be an endearingly real take on such situations and thought Affleck and Cooper did especially great work in it.
 
Only saw the DVD, not the Blu-Ray.

It looks like it could have been made in the 70's, but the photography's not really of interest with this film. It would probably work just as well on a shitty VHS tape.
 
The blu-ray of Close-up blu-ray is absolutely stunning. The photography in the film is gorgeous in its blending of narrative and documentary aesthetics.
 
Gotcha laz, and thanks Lance, I was talking about the Blu Ray, I've had a pretty cruddy rip on my computer, didn't want to watch it that way.
 
Winnie the Pooh

First of all, I'd like to mention that the "Ballad of Nessie" alone (the short cartoon before the film) is worth the cost of admission. I miss cartoons like that.

And that was where the nostalgia fun began, and it just didn't stop until after the credits ended. But don't think that that's all the movie's good for, a trip down memory lane. While looking a great deal like the original, and capturing that feeling so very well, Winnie the Pooh is also an amazing stand-alone film. The characters are as endearing as ever (though Owl's characterization was a tad off...and by a tad, I mean Owl was on crack the whole movie) and while the plot may be a tad scatter-shot, that works, since we are of course watching the imaginary world of a young child.

I laughed so hard at the first 20 minutes or so that my stomach literally hurt most of the rest of the movie, which was unfortunate since it remained fairly hilarious throughout.

Just...it's worth seeing. I can't understand why they don't make more movies like this, just wonderful heartfelt films. I saw a trailer for Puss in Boots before hand that had a joke about prison rape in the trailer. I don't get it.


ALSO, I saw a movie poster for the Lion King 3D remaster. Why didn't I know this was happening?!
 
bono_212 said:
I saw a trailer for Puss in Boots before hand that had a joke about prison rape in the trailer. I don't get it.

I got it. It was just hideously awful.

:wink:

Fully agree with you, btw. Sharp animation, strong dialogue, clever gags, and a true-to-form storyline came together to make for a quality walk down memory lane and a great film in its own right. I was genuinely surprised by how funny the first act was, considering The Many Adventures wasn't exactly gut-busting.
 
I saw a trailer for Puss in Boots before hand that had a joke about prison rape in the trailer. I don't get it.

THIS is why I loved Winnie the Pooh so much. No compromises on its purity and appropriateness for everyone.


Whatever, you enjoy your Disney fluff. Me and the cool kids will be first in line for The Human CentiPuss.
 
Harry Potter 8 - 9/10. Loved it. It's nice to see Alan Rickman get to do some real acting and emoting. I love the dragon escape, the pathos towards the death of key characters. The makeup of the dead characters was so well done I actually felt like I was looking at real dead bodies. It was fun seeing Bonham Carter playing Hermione playing LeStrange. Fiennes chews the scenery well and has a fun hug that got the crowd to guffaw. Now Warner Bros. will have to find another franchise to exploit on multiple blu-rays and DVDs.
 
Movies I watched on my flights to LA and back:

Love and Other Drugs
I thought Jake Gyllenhaal and Anne Hathaway were fantastic and had amazing onscreen chemistry, but the younger brother of Gyllenhaal's character poisoned the screen with his very presence and has to be one of the vilest, most annoying supporting characters ever. Not enough to ruin the whole movie but ughh.

Never Let Me Go
Based on one of my favourite books ever, it was overall disappointing though at times it did manage to capture the haunting, poignant quality of the novel. It also got a bit better once the action moved away from the school and the characters were grown-ups, I thought the main three leads did a fair job with what they were given.

The Fighter
I really enjoyed it once I got used to Christian Bale's rather OTT performance. I had no wish to watch it at the cinema, probably because Million Dollar Baby soured me towards grimy-looking boxing movies, but it turned out to be more like an engaging family drama which alternately made me wish that the main character would just get the heck away from his screwed-up family and recognise that they're important people in his life no matter what. It was also nice to see Amy Adams in a tougher kind of role.

The Big Sleep
At this point my brain started to curdle from sheer lack of sleep, so the finer details of the plot flew right over my head. I did enjoy the hard-boiled dialogue and I've actually never seen young Lauren Bacall in a film before.

The Tourist
Started to watch this, but the total lack of spark between Johnny Depp and Angelina Jolie and their general dullness made me turn it off a few minutes in. I've seen Depp in a straight kind of role before and I just don't think he pulls off playing an everyman very well.

Limitless
I've no idea what kind of person Bradley Cooper is in real life so I might be grossly unfair here, but he just has this onscreen presence of an asshole and I can't ever bring myself to like him. Strangely enough, it actually works in this movie where his character -is- a rather unlikeable aspiring writer who discovers a top-secret drug that allows him to use his brain to 100% capacity. It's an interesting scenario and it made for a pretty suspenseful watching with some neat visuals.

No Strings Attached
Kinda similar to Love and Other Drugs - boy meets girl, boy and girl agree to be in it just for sex, you can guess where it leads blah blah. It wasn't as good but Ashton Kutcher and Natalie Portman were both likeable and wow it's been forever since I saw Kevin Kline in anything new(ish).

The Adjustment Bureau
I thought that the idea of a secret bureau controlling the destiny of the world was intriguing, but in the end the concept turned out to be more interesting than the actual movie which had a few too many ludicrous details (magic hats... please!) and mixed romance with sci-fi in a way that kinda diluted both. And I don't always roll my eyes at the message of True Love, but I sure did here.
 
American History X

One of the most frustrating films I've ever seen. On one hand, the film is supremely well acted, lovingly shot and well paced. Everything is in its right place, and I never thought any one aspect of the storyline was ignored.

On the other hand...this has got to be one of the preachiest films I've ever seen, and it doesn't work, because neither side of the argument is properly fleshed out. The screenplay is, to describe it broadly, very weak. For every cogent point about equality and "best man for the job" made by the skinhead side, there's degrading language that harms any and all chances of commiseration. There's never a shade of grey anywhere (much like every waking moment of the homelife of these kids being saturated with racial turmoil, with zero normalcy). On the side of the "good guys," there's...not much of an argument at all. Perhaps the writers of this film didn't consider answers to the skinhead arguments necessary. There's never any voice of reason in this film, nobody there to break down ludicrous ideas. All there is is prison rape and black acquaintances to turn tides that had been rolling on for years and years.

Derek expresses his prejudices via socioeconomic rants...did he completely change his opinions on illegal immigration, welfare, outsourcing, etc. because of his experiences in prison? Perhaps he's still staunchly conservative, minus the white power propaganda and hateful rhetoric, but the film never goes deep enough into that. Instead it's the extraordinarily linear "white man hates black man, white man finds white man is as fucked up as every other race, white man loves black man." And it happens in about 40 minutes. I can understand Danny tearing his room apart at the drop of a hat after hearing his brother's story because I never got the impression that he bought into all that bullshit to begin with, but I assumed Derek's racism was something he at least took some time to think through. Guess not.

Also, the ending didn't sit right with me because I don't know how Derek responded to it. If he had gone back to being a skinhead prick, the conclusion of the film would have been considerably different than what we were given (namely, we have a LONG way to go vs. just let shit go because we're basically past all that). I'm going on the assumption that Derek has changed his ways for good, but you can't tell from what we have here. I don't mind ambiguous endings, but this one makes a strong claim and doesn't follow through on it: so it's not good to let shit piss you off. OK, how did Derek respond to his brother being murdered by a black kid? And, if he responded positively/negatively, how did it impact his life? Was he happier than he would have been otherwise? This is shit that a slightly deeper film would have tackled. As it is, I think the moral is pretty decent, and I generally enjoyed the rest of the film. The first half especially. The second moved far too quickly, and the outside influence of the skinhead gangs (unrealistically) disappeared out of the blue.

I want to discuss this film before I rate it on netflix and the like, because I'm not sure if I missed something and am way off the mark here.

PS: The basketball scene is patently retarded.
 
Harry Potter 8 - 9/10. Loved it. It's nice to see Alan Rickman get to do some real acting and emoting. I love the dragon escape, the pathos towards the death of key characters. The makeup of the dead characters was so well done I actually felt like I was looking at real dead bodies. It was fun seeing Bonham Carter playing Hermione playing LeStrange. Fiennes chews the scenery well and has a fun hug that got the crowd to guffaw. Now Warner Bros. will have to find another franchise to exploit on multiple blu-rays and DVDs.

The weakest HP movie as far as I'm concerned. Part 1 was considerably better. Still Prisoner of Azkaban and Order - due to the directing of the Phoenix - a tight script - remain the two really good ones.

The screenplay writer can't get it right.

The entire plotline about Dumbledore's past if barely touched upon, as is a more detailed description about the Hallows and Horcruxes. The movie should be much more than just the - admiteddly the best part of the movie - Gringott heist and the - admiteddly LOTR wannabe - massive end battle. Then again, that's what happens if you split the movie too late.

And the key points were all murdered by the script writers ...

the big kiss between Ron and Hermione - not even close
Snape's weakest memory - not a mention of the "Mudblood" scene and how much it cost Snape (incidentally, weak cliche acting from Rickman in the Godric Hollow scene)
Snape crying ? Seriously ? Takes away all meaning from the "Look. At. Me." line
the "just you and me, Mark" scene instead of that tension filled confrontation in the Great Hall. The Death Eaters didn't flee, either. Harry just finished off the biggest villain in wizard history and ... no reaction from anyone. At all.
Voldemort/Bellatrix just disintegrates ? Indeed. And he doesn't feel the Horcruxes being destroyed...but anyway.
Gambon still delivers lines with the interest of a mummy.


And possibly - and there were a lot of those over the years - the most grating/forced funny scenes in the entire series.

"you and whose army?" Yawn. "Ha!" cackle from Voldemort* and later on him hugging Malfoy and the most grating of them all "I always wanted to use that spell". from McGonagall which manages to surpass the burning of the Burrow in HP6 as the most pointless moment in the movies. And the "ageing" in the prologue was done pathetically - the audience got a big laugh out of it. The trio standing alone at Hogwars - if predictable - would have been a much better ending.
"Boom ? Boom !" Yes, they really did go there...the script and the forced humour take away from the best moments, Gringott and the final Harry-Dumbledore scene.

* a real shame because, finally, Fiennes manages to convey the menace of the character in this one. The true highlight of the movie.
 
People, if you've been paying attention, ever since the films actually had to balls to adapt the source material instead of making audio-books with visuals (POA on) the stories have focused solely on Harry, so while it would have been cool to get the backgrounds of everyone that is developed in the novel, it makes the films flow to develop the hero (and his two friends) rather than slavishly attempting to shoehorn in every detail of every character. This is most evident with Order of the Phoenix which took the longest book in the series and made the shortest film, everything that wasn't pushing the Harry story along was chucked. The films don't have to replace the novels for anyone, those details are still there. Besides, WB will decide like next year they want to reboot as a TV series, and then you can get every detail you want.
 
People? Who are you addressing? I think only one person raised issues with the film.

Anyway, that's beside the point. I disagree with most everything that U2girl has to say about the film, but I'll just leave it at that.
 
Yeah, I used people because while it was only one person here, that kind of attitude is everywhere amongst the novels' obsessive fans that aren't into filmmaking.
 
People? Who are you addressing? I think only one person raised issues with the film.

Anyway, that's beside the point. I disagree with most everything that U2girl has to say about the film, but I'll just leave it at that.

peoples?, these are Harry Potter films.

little boys flying around on brooms
 
Just watched the 3rd and 4th Harry Potters. They were quite good. The creature content was above average and I liked the little invalid Voldemort thing (especially when he canonballed into the cauldron). Would be a cool Halloween costume to carry that around. Anyway, the 3rd and 4th were better than the first two that I fell asleep during. Apparently I should watch those ones before continuing so I know the whole back story.
 
Yeah, I used people because while it was only one person here, that kind of attitude is everywhere amongst the novels' obsessive fans that aren't into filmmaking.

The "they should fill in every detail from the books" attitude is not the point being made.

Another example : HBP sacrificed much of the real story behind the book - Voldemort's past - for teen romance. And they didn't get the climax right, either.
 
That was my point U2girl, I also like that we learn more about Voldemort in the novel, but as I said, Harry is the sole focus of the films. They had to streamline it to make it work on film. I'm a fan of the books, but I remember hating the first film, and being floored when Prisoner of Azkaban came out because they got a crew to bring something to life instead of putting on a puppet show of the novel. I think for the most part many things could have been clarified with but a few lines of dialog in each of the last 6 films, and they are not perfect of course, but they're artistic and exciting, and driven by the development of their 3 leads, and I'm OK with them as they are.

Also, Part I just might be the best of the series, but it really is all one big movie and doesn't really need to be separated, II is the action denouement of the story, even moreso than Quantum of Solace is to Casino Royale as it was made all as a whole with the same filmmaker.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom