djerdap said:Because of the length. The Blender magazine said it was a 6:30 song. Fits the description.
geeman said:Is FAST CARS slowly leaking onto the internet.... ??
dream chaser said:Like a loop???
mlrg said:
No, it's the full song. But the bitrate is lower than the HTDAAB leaks
dream chaser said:okily dokily... thx artdirector, i was getting a tad confused there... sooo, should I not bother with a higher bitrate on the mp3 since the source of Mercy is so low? Pretty much everything else I have I can post higher...
dream chaser said:
Ooohh, lol.
Speaking of... I'm thinking of putting 320 kbps versions of all the xtras so far... Would anyone be interested or should I not bother? Right now the ones on my site are just 160 b/c the majority of traffic I usually get seems to prefer faster dl time to higher quality. ???
neutral said:
There's really no point in ripping a lossy file to a higher bitrate, it won't improve the quality at all. If we had the WAV files (or a FLAC or SHN) of a leak we could do it.
It's cool that you're going to host some now, I'm sure yousendit thanks you.
dream chaser said:
And, speaking of FLAC, I'm starting to think that's the best way to share some of these (CD > WAV > FLAC)... I got the RnH outtakes as FLAC from a bittorrent site & the quality was amazing! So much so, I refuse to even make mp3s out of them, lol... (oh no! I'm becoming a music snob! I should get a new site... www.u2flac.com )