Irvine511
Blue Crack Supplier
[Q]On Sunday, Republicans appeared to be preparing to blunt the impact of any charges. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, Republican of Texas, speaking on the NBC news program "Meet the Press," compared the leak investigation with the case of Martha Stewart and her stock sale, "where they couldn't find a crime and they indict on something that she said about something that wasn't a crime."
Ms. Hutchison said she hoped "that if there is going to be an indictment that says something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn't indict on the crime and so they go to something just to show that their two years of investigation was not a waste of time and taxpayer dollars."
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/24/politics/24leak.html
[/Q]
gosh, let me think ... when was the last time someone was, say, impeached on a perjury technicality after not commiting any sort of crime (except the crime of a blow job, which is distinctly non-procreative sex, , so therefore, to some minds, it should be a crime) just to show that Ken Star hadn't wasted time and taxpayer dollars?
Ms. Hutchison said she hoped "that if there is going to be an indictment that says something happened, that it is an indictment on a crime and not some perjury technicality where they couldn't indict on the crime and so they go to something just to show that their two years of investigation was not a waste of time and taxpayer dollars."
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/24/politics/24leak.html
[/Q]
gosh, let me think ... when was the last time someone was, say, impeached on a perjury technicality after not commiting any sort of crime (except the crime of a blow job, which is distinctly non-procreative sex, , so therefore, to some minds, it should be a crime) just to show that Ken Star hadn't wasted time and taxpayer dollars?