Matthew_Page2000
War Child
Ok, so maybe not.
It's been a few years since the Oasis craze hit its zenith so I figure now is a safe time to ask...
What the heck was the deal with the Oasis phenomenom anyway?
They were a nice band. They wrote catchy, anthemic songs and somehow the British press and a rabid fanbase spun those modest achievements into a hyperbolic frenzy.
You know, with headlines like:
OASIS ARE THE GREATEST ROCK BAND OF ALL TIME.
OASIS: THE BEST BAND SINCE THE BEATLES
NOEL GALLAGHER: BETTER THAN LENNON?
It's been a couple of years since assorted lunatics from the Isles tried to convince me that Liam was a better singer than Bono or that Noel was a better guitarist than Hendrix and a better songwriter than Dylan or McCartney.
Are the Oasis fans properly chastened yet or are they still true believers?
I'm a big enough of a man to admit that I had Pearl Jam pegged all wrong. In 1994 I was convinced that they were the second coming of the Who and were on their way to equalling U2's brilliance.
A decade later and I'm forced to admit that Pearl Jam are (and were) an extremely good but somewhat derivative band with a potent live show. Certainly nothing to sneeze at but not the equals of the Who, the Beatles or U2.
Do Oasis fans feel similarly or are they still hanging on?
Yours,
A curious American.
It's been a few years since the Oasis craze hit its zenith so I figure now is a safe time to ask...
What the heck was the deal with the Oasis phenomenom anyway?
They were a nice band. They wrote catchy, anthemic songs and somehow the British press and a rabid fanbase spun those modest achievements into a hyperbolic frenzy.
You know, with headlines like:
OASIS ARE THE GREATEST ROCK BAND OF ALL TIME.
OASIS: THE BEST BAND SINCE THE BEATLES
NOEL GALLAGHER: BETTER THAN LENNON?
It's been a couple of years since assorted lunatics from the Isles tried to convince me that Liam was a better singer than Bono or that Noel was a better guitarist than Hendrix and a better songwriter than Dylan or McCartney.
Are the Oasis fans properly chastened yet or are they still true believers?
I'm a big enough of a man to admit that I had Pearl Jam pegged all wrong. In 1994 I was convinced that they were the second coming of the Who and were on their way to equalling U2's brilliance.
A decade later and I'm forced to admit that Pearl Jam are (and were) an extremely good but somewhat derivative band with a potent live show. Certainly nothing to sneeze at but not the equals of the Who, the Beatles or U2.
Do Oasis fans feel similarly or are they still hanging on?
Yours,
A curious American.