MrBrau1
ONE love, blood, life
Earnie Shavers said:"The Agenda" is to take How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb around the back for a right beating.
Exactly.
And the multiple polls, all involving HTDAAB, allowed for tons of it.
Earnie Shavers said:"The Agenda" is to take How To Dismantle An Atomic Bomb around the back for a right beating.
MrBrau1 said:
Exactly.
And the multiple polls, all involving HTDAAB, allowed for tons of it.
WildHoneyAlways said:And people are taking this personally why??
MrBrau1 said:
If writing funny and bad things about HTDAAB in 8 different polls over 3 days gets them off, let them get off.
Zootlesque said:
Okkkayyy... so what's the problem, then? If you're gonna just let these people get off, then let them continue making polls. Why are you protesting? Doesn't make sense.
MrBrau1 said:
If you will read my previous posts, you will see, I never said the polls needed to be stopped.
Sticking with this thread's subject, I've provided my own commentary. I simply noted a trend in the polls, which was to bash HTDAAB, and that the polls seemed created for that very purpose.
Zootlesque said:On the other hand, namkcuR's poll for JT vs. Bomb was definitely biased from the get go. The line 'Vote for the Tree. Just do it!' shows that the agenda was to beat the shit out of HTDAAB at the slightest chance available.
namkcuR said:
There was no agenda! I was just having some fun with that line!
indra said:which is fine. But even if you don't like them, you should show some respect for those who do and just not read or post in them. Is it really that hard to allow other people to enjoy things you don't?
amerrydeath said:I thought the "Vote for the Tree. Just do it" line was totally tongue-in-cheek and meant to be funny, not to offend anyone
I kind of enjoy the polls, it's interesting to see how the lurkers vote
MrBrau1 said:I simply noted a trend in the polls, which was to bash HTDAAB, and that the polls seemed created for that very purpose.
gareth brown said:still waiting for a 'Bomb vs. Bomb' poll, guys....
financeguy said:
That impression is largely in your own head. Are we now saying that including HTDAAB in a poll option constitutes 'bashing' it? Why should HTDAAB be given some kind of special exemption? Maybe someone was just interested in seeing how the fanbase rated HTDAAB compared to some of the older albums. Seems a reasonable enough objective given that it's the most recent album.
MrBrau1 said:No, my impression is correct. And I wasn't the only one who noticed it.
MrBrau1 said:
No, my impression is correct. And I wasn't the only one who noticed it.
roy said:For starters I seem to remember:
"Vote for the Tree. Just do it."
"Vote For The Fire. Just Do It."
and that was from the originator of the poll.
financeguy said:
OK in future HTDAAB will be exempted from all polls, it's in a unique category of its own and it would be wrong to expose it to the vulgarity of competition.
financeguy said:
But anyway Joshua Tree and UF are clearly better than HTDAAB. Sorry but they just are.
U2Man said:financeguy, this statement makes the entire point you've been trying to make in here invalid.
bonosgirl84 said:
maybe he's enjoying stating his opinion here in this thread. and even if you don't like it, why don't you show some respect and just not read his opinion or post back at him? is it really so hard to just let him enjoy posting his opinion even if you don't enjoy it?