I also disagree with the idea U2 would only do Melbourne/Sydney. The amount of interstate travellers probably still wouldn't be enough for them to do three shows in either/both cities, while they could sell out a gig in Brisbane, Adelaide, and Perth. That said, they won't do two gigs in Brisbane. They could've with the usual set-up but the heightened capacity of 360 should rule it out - especially if they are able to swing a coveted Lang Park slot.
I can't see Melbourne being at the G. It'll be 2x Etihad. Bet on it.
Why are we still talking about U2 leaving claws behind? It was a flippant comment, and seems to be taken way too seriously. I hardly believe that, even if it is serious, it would impact tour planning.
South Africa DESERVES gigs. I think the big question, though, is whether the band will actually have time to get there. Australia/New Zealand/Japan will take up a chunk of time, especially with transport requirements.
I can't see Melbourne being at the G. It'll be 2x Etihad. Bet on it.
Why are we still talking about U2 leaving claws behind? It was a flippant comment, and seems to be taken way too seriously. I hardly believe that, even if it is serious, it would impact tour planning.
South Africa DESERVES gigs. I think the big question, though, is whether the band will actually have time to get there. Australia/New Zealand/Japan will take up a chunk of time, especially with transport requirements.