...and perfect timing for reading this blurb from the National Post:
Cultural Studies: Are U2 even better than the real thing after their Apple release stunt for Songs of Innocence? | National Post
3. THE CRITICS
Time was when music critics acted as gatekeepers for listeners pondering which precious few, expensive LP/cassette/CDs they should purchase. Reviews would be based on good access to advance copies, but due to labels’ cost-cutting and paranoia about leaks, physical promo has been replaced by poor-quality streams and often just a supervised listen or two. With surprise releases such as U2’s, writers are truly scrambling. Harried by their outlets’ desire to be “first” on everything, they’re reduced to hedging bets while meeting super-tight deadlines. Witness Caspar Llewellyn-Smith’s statement about Songs of Innocence in The Guardian: “all is opaque, at least on a first listen.” Music fans need such “considered opinions” like a fish needs a bicycle. The best a critic can hope to do is to add context and illuminate certain aspects of the record for those who will have had ample chance to listen already. The most worthwhile critical writing does this anyway. Anyone can tweet first reactions; maybe the surprise release will convince editors to relent and allow writers the chance to reflect once again.
Hear hear.