Irvine511
Blue Crack Supplier
believe if a woman feels she's raped now a days, she will find a way to fork over the money to prove it.
i'm sorry, but this has to be one of the worst sentences i've read on FYM.
believe if a woman feels she's raped now a days, she will find a way to fork over the money to prove it.
diamond, what other crime do you know of where the victim is required to pay for the costs of the police investigation?believe if a woman feels she's raped now a days, she will find a way to fork over the money to prove it.
What, Palin is against the establishment?
Is she a communist?
believe if a woman feels she's raped now a days, she will find a way to fork over the money to prove it.
i think paying for a rape kit ads as a deterrent to false accusations of rape-which are huge these days-by your own allusion.
believe if a woman feels she's raped now a days, she will find a way to fork over the money to prove it.
<>
i think paying for a rape kit ads as a deterrent to false accusations of rape-which are huge these days-by your own allusion.
i think you're also underestimating the strength of womanhood, and women working together.
believe if a woman feels she's raped now a days, she will find a way to fork over the money to prove it.
it's ok, we can agree to disagree here as we do the majority of the time-civilly.
<>
i voted for someone who i felt would be the best candidate for president for a variety of factors.
i'm sorry the world doesn't work the way you want it to.
i think Obama felt he was qualified and prepared to be president on February 10, 2007, and he spent the following 18 months convincing the Democrats that he was. and it turns out that he was right.
diamond, what other crime do you know of where the victim is required to pay for the costs of the police investigation?
The question was, do you think Obama was qualified and prepared to be president on February 10, 2007? I didn't ask you what Obama thought, or what he did over the next 18 months, I'm asking you if you think he was qualified and prepared on February 10, 2007.
That is disgusting Dave. Others have asked you this repeatedly, but what other crime victim has to pay to prove they were victimized? Why rape?
i think they are different qualifications.
Tim Kaine was not selected to be Obama's running mate.
in her next term as governor, she can give us a coherent statement on foreign policy. if you can find one given before August 29, 2008, i'd love to hear it.
Please explain.
If Obama had picked Tim Kaine to be his running mate, would you still be voting for Obama on November 4, 2008?
what i thought on 2/10/07 is irrelevant to the situation at hand -- he was a candidate, he made his case, and he convinced me.
that's what presidential candidates do.
and that's why the vice-presidency is a different matter altogether.
keep at it!
I'm not asking you what you thought on 2/10/07, I'm simply asking you based on what you know at the current time about Obama's qualifications and level of being prepared for the office on 2/10/07, do you think he was prepared and Qualified to be President when he started his run for the office?
i've explained repeatedly.
a president campaigns for your vote. a VP is selected by the P to take over.
Well, actually a VP does campaign for your vote unless of course the VP is selected while the President is occupying the office.
But you have stated that the qualifications for Vice President and President are different. To be elected a President does have to receive his party's nomination while the Vice President does not, but what were talking about here is qualifications, experience, being prepared etc. So what exactly is the difference?
and i'm telling you that i don't know. there's no magic, arbitrary standard that one must meet. there are, however, several characteristics that successful candidates often share, not least of which are a record of engagement on national issues and foreign policy.
Well, actually a VP does campaign for your vote unless of course the VP is selected while the President is occupying the office.
But you have stated that the qualifications for Vice President and President are different. To be elected a President does have to receive his party's nomination while the Vice President does not, but what were talking about here is qualifications, experience, being prepared etc. So what exactly is the difference?
What was Governor Clintons record on foreign policy just prior to running for President?
Maybe it would be easier if you just said what you want Irvine to say instead of trying to trap him into a response for three pages in a row.
From a legal stand point, by having a person pay for a procedure in an allegation it bodes better in a legal argument, but yes I understand your point-it leaves poor ppl out in the cold-which is sad.
it's been given to you. go look it up. i'm running out of patience.
you're not being half as clever as you seem to think.
A shooting victim should have to pay for the forensics test for fingerprints on a gun.
A stabbing victim should have to pay for the blood test to make sure it's his own blood on the knife.
If he's really just trying to get a rise out of people, he gets suspended, doesn't he?
NSW said it best: you're a fucking joke.
Actually it hasn't. He was listed as being the Chair of the DLC but there is no record of any foreign policy positions that he took. Since your so convinced that Governor Clinton was qualified and Sarah Palin is not, I thought you might be able to list a few.
Actually it hasn't. He was listed as being the Chair of the DLC but there is no record of any foreign policy positions that he took. Since your so convinced that Governor Clinton was qualified and Sarah Palin is not, I thought you might be able to list a few.