You guys all know, of course, that if the Bastards (in "Acrobat" parlance, aka the music and film industries) win in the Supreme Court case "MGM vs Grokster" that is being heard on March 29th, all this nifty technology will be pretty much be rendered obsolete. If the case goes aginst Grokster, then most of the new technology that we will be using to dicument and share info about the tour will be declared illegal.
The NY Times had an article on this on Thursday. I posted a link in FYM , I will find it and repost it here.
For me, the scariest thing was finding out that the United States Supreme Court court actually heard a similar case, "Sony Vs Betamax", in 1984, to decide whether VCR's could be declared illegal. The court, which had a more left-leaning makeup than today (think about that, it was the heightof the Reagan era, and Congress was also Democratic), decided, as we all know, in favor of Betamax. SONY was concerned that the prospect of people being allowed to tape programs off of TV would hurt film and TV viewersip.
We all know how THAT panned out, and how the VCR inspired howmany other technologies, which we take for granted today? THINK of what our culture would have like if Sony had won.
That is what is at stake here, folks. This , as the article says, is about SO much more than file-sharing, and so many other things that have nothng to do with film and music would be affected. IN effect, only the Supreme Court could kill progress (in the US anyway), but on March 29, that could very well happen..
What a horrible irony if MGM wins. Vertigo 205 would treat concertgoers to a celebration of new technolgy (as we hear with each passing day), but if this goes throuhg, in stead of a ceelbration, the tour could in some way be about the passing of an era, as people find that the fairttale world insaide the arean will not be reproducable at home, the workplace--or on the street...