I was just going to say that maybe U2 wanted it to sound this way and that's the trouble. This kind of vocal from Bono is what the mainstream has come to expect from him this decade. It's so formulaic and typical. It's dull and calculated for mass appeal.Did you ever think maybe that's how they wanted it to sound? And how it sits well with Sheridan's film?
I wonder if it was recorded after the first leg of the tour and his voice was kinda ruined at that point. I've never understood Bono's criticism that his voice sounded too high. It was unskilled on the first 3 albums and maybe even the 4th, but I never thought that what was missing was more grit. He just needed a greater range and sense of how to sing. Anyway, I preferred the '90s-sounding vocal of the first version.
Now that you say that, the snob in me wants to give it much more effort.Actually I like it. I still love the original, but this is a different version and some bits of the song do project better. Now that the lyrics in the chorus are more inteligible, it's noticeable that they are actually beautiful.
It does seem as though this is the version Eno was talking about.