GibsonExplorer
War Child
I can't bring up a pair right now.
It's like 12 hours later and I can still order 8 tickets for Chicago 1 through ticketmaster.
I can't bring up a pair right now.
It's like 12 hours later and I can still order 8 tickets for Chicago 1 through ticketmaster.
It's like 12 hours later and I can still order 8 tickets for Chicago 1 through ticketmaster.
You must have a special Ticketmaster page. I think your mistaking Chicago 2 for Chicago 1.
Nothing comes up for Chicago 1. Chicago 2, yes you can pull up 8 tickets.
I went and checked and I discovered what has confused some people here. If you go to U2.com the "TICKETS" sign is up again for the September 12, 2009 show. So naturally, they click on it thinking its taking them to the September 12 show, but it actually takes you to the page for the September 13 show.
So, they pull up tickets thinking they are for the Saturday show, when in fact they are for the Sunday show. I wonder if they actually sold any tickets for the Sunday show, but with the buyer believing he was purchasing for the Saturday show.
Shows sell out are just a marketing ploy to keep folks interested. (at every show on last tour you could get tickets the day of show at box office. (that is why GAs seem to sell out but they hold 10-20% for day of show. I said earlier the band didnt play 5 nights on letterman to sell albums. U2 is in it for the money and the braggin rights. Always have been....... They want to beat the Stones tour as the stones beat them last tour after U2 thought they had it in the bag.
There will be many stadiums not sold out in USA leg of tour. Remember the STones did stadiums arenas and clubs on their tour. Hopefully for the 10 tour they will do some fun things as well. There are plenty of open dates if they wanted to do a club show between cities.
Best idea to sell out stadiums is to price like airlines. (change price based on availabilty) They now should reduce 250 tickets to 200 or 175 and see how many sell and then reduce more untill they sell the damn place out.But clearing 1-2 million a night aint too bad for irish chaps...
No offense to U2, but the opportunity to check out the new Cowboys Stadium is likely half the draw for a lot of those people.Amazingly, the Dallas show is almost soldout after just 6 hours!
It might be a high operating profit, but the fixed costs on this tour are a beast. I wouldn't be surprised to find that the operating costs + overhead for the 2009 leg alone is over $100 million.By the way, the average gross per show for this tour is going to be between $6 million and $8 million, NOT 1-2 million. 50% to 75% of that is pure profit for the band.
No offense to U2, but the opportunity to check out the new Cowboys Stadium is likely half the draw for a lot of those people.
It might be a high operating profit, but the fixed costs on this tour are a beast. I wouldn't be surprised to find that the operating costs + overhead for the 2009 leg alone is over $100 million.
No offense to U2, but the opportunity to check out the new Cowboys Stadium is likely half the draw for a lot of those people.
i wonder what venue they will play in the bay area in 2010. candlestick park, maybe? since they are only doing football stadiums.
could they play oakland stadium? i know the raiders play there, but isnt it a baseball configuration?
Honestly, I think maybe half of the USA shows will sell out, the others will come close to sold out or have very large crowds. For example, I don't think 80,000 tickets will sell in Norman, but they will easily sell 50,000+....that's not bad for Oklahoma.
Not sure where you got the daily costs of each tour, but do off days count on your cost estimates? It's hard to break the cost structure down to a single per-day or per-show cost at this point because we don't know how long the tour lasts, and you'd have to amortize the fixed costs over the life of the tour. My only point was that it's possible that their books don't show a true profit for a while, at least until 2010. It's amazing what a good accountant can do for an entertainer, and U2 have proven to be among the best in the world at managing their money.Even if the cost of the 360 tour is 2.5 million per show, the profit will FAR exceed the cost, since the tour will gross between $600 million and $700 million over 100 shows. Cost of 100 shows $250 million, profit $350 million to $450 milion. Thats IF the cost were that high, and its probably a little lower, like just under $2 million per show.
It's not silly at all. Look at the secondary market ticket prices to get into opening day at the new Mets and Yankees ballparks. Look at the way that the Arizona Cardinals went from 35k fans per game to a season ticket waiting list when they opened their stadium in Glendale. People want to go to events in new facilities, and the Cowboys' new stadium is one of the highest-profile stadium openings in NFL history. It's not that a new stadium is the only draw, but it helps sell tickets. It's why people like Jerry Jones build new stadiums in the first place.That's just silly. Why would someone buy a U2 ticket just to see a new stadium when they are doing free tours? I'm sure someone who wasn't even interested in U2 logged into TM and paid at least 50 dollars just to see a stadium.
You're assuming that the Cowboys aren't sold out in advance. Dallas has a season ticket waiting list this year for the first time in several years, even though the capacity in the new stadium is 15,000 more than Texas Stadium.Well, this tour has fantastic sales in every market it is playing so far, many of them smaller than Dallas. New stadiums are nice, but I doubt non-fans are buying tickets at $95 and $250 just to see what the stadium looks like. They will have plenty of opportunities before this show happens to do that, with the Dallas Cowboys playing many home games in August, September and early October.
It's not silly at all. Look at the secondary market ticket prices to get into opening day at the new Mets and Yankees ballparks. Look at the way that the Arizona Cardinals went from 35k fans per game to a season ticket waiting list when they opened their stadium in Glendale. People want to go to events in new facilities, and the Cowboys' new stadium is one of the highest-profile stadium openings in NFL history. It's not that a new stadium is the only draw, but it helps sell tickets. It's why people like Jerry Jones build new stadiums in the first place.
Whoever thought that they'd sell 34,000 tickets in Dallas was crazy - U2 could play the Cotton Bowl and get 50k; it's the fourth-largest metro region in the US. But the quick sellout likely has a lot to do with the stadium.
That kind of logic works for sporting events, not concerts. Families(couples, etc) will go to a football, baseball, basketball game just to go and a new stadium would definately peak some interest for a family that hasn't gone to a game in awhile, but concerts will be attended by people who like the music regardless of the venue. A new stadium isn't going to peak my interest into attending a New Kids on the Block reunion.
I'm not a big baseball fan but when I lived in Chicago would catch a live game every once in awhile because it was Wrigley field and a fun social event. But no venue in the world is going to make my father entertain the idea of going to a U2 concert, that logic just isn't interchangable.
There are A LOT of people out there who like U2's music but would probably never go to their concert. But if you're from Texas, a Cowboys fan, and U2 is playing at the brand new stadium, I'm sure these people would be more inclined to go to the stadium. I know a lot of Ohio State fans who would probably go to a U2 concert at OSU stadium just because of where it is, not to mention it's a band they sorta like.
Some people go to concerts for dumb reasons. I once went to a Creed concert because a girl I liked was going. A friend of mine went with us to the May 7th Vertigo concert in Chicago. He had a slight interest in their music, but he mainly just wanted to see Chicago.