Tarik
The Fly
I know that after the 11/09 attack the sense of a security in the USA has suffered damages, and thats understandable to me.
But I have the assumption, and I think I am not the only one, that the Bush administration is utilizing it for his aim.
What aim? the new world order, bush himself mentioned.
So I think that the Iraq campaign ist not the last medium-term viewed.
And about the arab support for the US troops. That is not a contradiction to what I said.
I said they declared, that they don't see Saddam as an "acute" threat to them. That was their official statement.
So why are they supporting this campaign? Cause their regimes (Jordania, Katar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Kuweit) are totally dependent on the USA:
An example:
Katar - The ruler of katar remains in power only with US assistance: A putsch against him was blighted by US marines 4-5 months ago
And about the turkish support: that was kind of a deal, remember the force of the US to the European Union to accept Turkey as a member. And not to forget the financial help.
But I have the assumption, and I think I am not the only one, that the Bush administration is utilizing it for his aim.
What aim? the new world order, bush himself mentioned.
So I think that the Iraq campaign ist not the last medium-term viewed.
And about the arab support for the US troops. That is not a contradiction to what I said.
I said they declared, that they don't see Saddam as an "acute" threat to them. That was their official statement.
So why are they supporting this campaign? Cause their regimes (Jordania, Katar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Kuweit) are totally dependent on the USA:
An example:
Katar - The ruler of katar remains in power only with US assistance: A putsch against him was blighted by US marines 4-5 months ago
And about the turkish support: that was kind of a deal, remember the force of the US to the European Union to accept Turkey as a member. And not to forget the financial help.