I appreciate you actually acknowledging a need for a safety net and ditching the garbage “taxes are theft”.
I appreciate your charity and the fact that you do as much as you can, I truly do.
But charity will never be able to help the systematic poor or unhealthy. Period.
Charity doesn’t have the capabilities to consistently provide, charity will always ebb and flow according to their donations and need.
Charity is limiting not only due to fluctuations of money, but also due to lack of systems.
I have so much more, but have to run, I look forward to your responses.
"I appreciate you actually acknowledging a need for a safety net and ditching the garbage “taxes are theft”."
I don't think it's much of. concession to acknowledge the need for a safety net, vague as the verbiage is. It's a rather universally accepted premise. The question becomes a matter of methodology and ethics.
"The garbage 'taxation is theft...'"
Yet, we would never accept such coercive means of wealth accumulation from any other institution in society. It certainly shares more features with white collar theft than a private charity in this respect.
"But charity will never be able to help the systematic poor or unhealthy. Period."
...With private initiative crowded out by the popular assumption that the state will provide services X, Y, and Z. However, mutual aid has a significant history that preexisted the modern welfare state.
"Mutual aid was particularly popular among the poor and the working class. For instance, in New York City in 1909 40 percent of families earning less than $1,000 a year, little more than the "living wage," had members who were in mutual-aid societies... By the 1920s, at least one out of every three males was a member of a mutual-aid society."
https://mises.org/library/welfare-welfare-state
And Britain...
"[T]here are very few welfare roles now carried out by the British state that were not pioneered in the voluntary sector which, by the 19th century, had become huge and diverse. There were charities for the relief of poverty, the treatment of the sick, the housing of the working classes, the education of poor children, the assistance of the disabled, the training of the unemployed, and so on."
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1435374/There-was-welfare-before-the-welfare-state.html
"Charity doesn’t have the capabilities to consistently provide, charity will always ebb and flow according to their donations and need."
As opposed to a nation-state that generates trillions of dollars of debt to be dumped on the next generation?
"Charity is limiting not only due to fluctuations of money, but also due to lack of systems."
In the present system, yes, there may be a "lack of systems" - But historically as presented above, that hasn't always been the case.