gvox
Ghost of Love
sounds like an Ace Of Base spin off...
Baseheads
YouTube - Public Enemy - Night Of The Living Baseheads: Dope Version
sounds like an Ace Of Base spin off...
I didn't prove your point, you misunderstood... I've been clarifying the misunderstanding surrounding the term because of your arrogant post (see above).But rhythm is a superficial similarity. Thank you for proving my point once again.
I said nothing about rhythm and tempo being the same. [...] So when you learn to read you'll understand what I was trying to say...
Which is that having the same rhythm is just as superficial of a similarity that having the same tempo is when it comes to this type of thread...
Listen to the verse of NLOTH...then listen to Lady With the Spinning Head. Very similar. And LWTSH of course is The Fly's hot sister
Ah yes, THAT I do hear. Strange how I totally don't link LWTSH with The Fly.
Pretty sure they're in different keys (I'm not sure off the top of my head what key UV is in), but the main progression and verse both go from a major I chord to the III chord.
What??! The Fly comes from LWTSH..I think the solo especially...
I think LWTSH descended from the same pre-song as The Fly... the solo is very Fly-ish. Probably couldn't release LWTSH on AB, among other reasons, because it was too similar...
Depending on my mood, I'd take LWTSH over The Fly. Put The Fly on it's b side.
You're assuming the link the OP (Original Poster) is trying to make (regarding rhythm) extends automatically to count/tempo. That's the superficial similarity... as the OP has pointed out, the two cannot be equated automatically... they're two different things.
And that's the point that the OP contested right away... and I agreed. The parallel you are trying to make is not given. It could be debated, but it's not given. I termed the two (rhythm and count/tempo) as superficially similar in that they are both song properties... but, as I initially said, you have to look deeper than superficial similarities...
Massive FAIL.
I said nothing about rhythm and tempo being the same.
With that same logic we'll see Acrobat because Breathe and Acrobat are the same count...
Sorry it's taken me a while to get back to this thread... Busy busy...
But thank you, ZooMacPhisto800 for filling in for me while I was away.
Now I don't want to get into a whole thing here, especially since it appears there may be a rift between ZooMacPhisto800 and BVS that predates this thread, however I would like to confirm tbat:
1) I was making a point about the rhythm specifically (as ZooMacPhisto800 pointed out... see above), and that
2) bringing tempo (or "count") into this has no bearing and is in fact another topic altogether.
If you will, I was talking apples and you (BVS) tried to halt or stop the discussion by talking about oranges.
So in this context, BVS' replies to ZooMacPhisto800 were incorrect, especially:
Though you didn't say that both were the same, you did state that if we're comparing rhythm we might as well compare tempo ("count"):
Again, rhythm and tempo (just like apples and oranges) are two different things. From your choice of words, BVS, and the tone of your replies, it came across as unsubstantiated and unnecessary nitpicking.
At least that's how I and ZooMacPhisto800 interpreted it (I won't speak for anyone else who may have been lurking).
Finally, from the way we (ZooMacPhisto800 and I) both posted in this thread, I don't see anything wrong or lacking with our reading comprehension skills. :rollseyes:
Now let the discussion continue, should anyone be interested in actually discussing the point I was trying to make/topic I was raising.
I FUCKING HATE ALL OF YOU!11!!1!!!!!1!!eleven!
NLOTH has been compared to every song known to man or God at this point.
I didn't want to post anymore in this thread because ZooMac is just a troll that likes to get into little debates over semantics and he'll change his meaning, etc, he's been doing this since day one and been busted for it in the past as well, so I wouldn't get too excited about him agreeing with you... I wasn't saying anything about your comprehension skills.
I disagree with you that they are apples and oranges in this paticular debate. My whole point was that bringing a song back into the setlist based on having a similar rhythm would be just as trivial as U2 bringing a song back based on having the same tempo(since U2 have very few songs that are 6/8). I think U2 are a band that like to bring older songs into the setlist based on themes or moods and I doubt very seriously that rhythms, tempos, song structures, etc play any part in that... ZooMac would have seen this if he wasn't so caught up in his games.
I FUCKING HATE ALL OF YOU!11!!1!!!!!1!!eleven!
NLOTH has been compared to every song known to man or God at this point.
I agree. NLOTH most reminds me of "Wannabe" by the Spice Girls. The two are nearly identical.
Then, naturally, there's a lot of the "Close Encounters" theme, written by John Williams, in there. It's as if U2 ripped that song off directly without changing a note.
Wankers.
So does anyone else think that they're playing "Ultraviolet" because the rhythm of the guitar is a bit similar to that of "No Line On The Horizon" (the song)?
Also, if this is true, might we also expect "The Fly" to surface for the very same reason?