lazarus
Blue Crack Supplier
Def Leppard over either of those. Love 'em or hate 'em, the sound they arrived at on Hysteria really sounded like nothing else.
https://www.stereogum.com/1975439/b...among-rock-hall-inductees-not-radiohead/news/
Bon Jovi makes Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. Radiohead does not. Cause that somehow makes sense.
Bon Jovi is just U2 without the politics.
I saw him last year. I had a smile on my face for 3 hours.I saw Paul McCartney last week. Wasn't gonna go because the tickets were so steeply priced, but Mum was super keen and uncharacteristically she said "let's just do it" and splashed out decent tix. Was a great night, filled with anecdotes and no less than 15 Beatles songs. Can't believe the old geezer powered through for 3+ hours.
Highlights for me were Love Me Do and In Spite of All The Danger, which I feel privileged to have experienced. His band were brilliant. His newer song "New" was really good as well. Some lovely tributes to George and John.
I saw Lance's Mom last year. I had a rash on my penis for 3 weeks.
I disagreeman, people in southern hemisphere sure have different opinions on things
CAN WE STOP TALKING ABOUT PAUL MCCARTNEY
Also, totally agree with Axver on Bon Jovi vs U2.
man, people in southern hemisphere sure have different opinions on things
Fosters clouds the mind.
HG and cori, you removed the important context of the preceding two clauses! Random middle-aged radio listener doesn't know or care about Zooropa. They just remember being 21 and getting drunk bellowing Pride or Livin' on a Prayer. They're both eighties stadium rock bands that people outside the fandom would not differentiate nearly as much as we do.
. At a lunchroom discussion, hair bands are still seen as a joke.
.
We don't know what any of those things meanHad shrimp on the barbie, bloomin' onions and Fosters been served that day the discussion would have taken a different turn.
Yeah I'm thinking this may be a viewpoint down under that is not held by too many folks in the first world.
Fosters clouds the mind.
I still disagree. My friends are those exact middle-aged casual listeners. I work at a place full of them. And when U2 was in town, they all clamored for tickets and talked about how important it was, how meaningful, to have a chance to see legends. At a lunchroom discussion, hair bands are still seen as a joke.
And they're not middle-aged, but my teenage students can tell the difference too. One day I put on Bon Jovi for some reason, and there was a lot of laughing and OMGs. When we listen to U2, I hear a lot about how "My parents love them!" Not the case with Bon Jovi.
It's like some of you have never been to a pub with a cover band cranking out Livin' on a Prayer to a crowd of 45 year old men.
Who goes to pubs filled with 45 year old men?
It's like some of you have never been to a pub with a cover band cranking out Livin' on a Prayer to a crowd of 45 year old men.
Who goes to pubs filled with 45 year old men?
I don't know about you, but I've got older relatives who like to take visitors like me to their local.
And aren't you a 40-something year old man?
This is truly a special post in Interference history.It's like some of you have never been to a pub with a cover band cranking out Livin' on a Prayer to a crowd of 45 year old men.
It's like some of you have never been to a pub with a cover band cranking out Livin' on a Prayer to a crowd of 45 year old men.