Oh man. I'm sure you've thought of this already.

[martha]

But if the new record does have that dreadful title about dismantling an atomic bomb, you realize that all the good reviews will have some lame pun about how this record is "da bomb," don't you?

 

[mikal]

things are really going to explode soon.

 

[mikal]

wait, Bush isn't going to assume that U2 has WMD's now, is he?

shit. be careful boys.......

 

[EvolutionMonkey]

Or if they don't like it they'll say "This album is a bomb that not even Bono can save"

 

[DaveC]

He may ask for proof of disarmament of this atomic bomb, and send in weapons inspectors to investigate, and then bomb U2 anyways.

 

[beli]

Kewl, I know the weapons inspectors.

I have more chance of seeing U2 that way then them touring Perth.

 

[Reggie Thee Dog]

I heard this album is going to "blow" people's minds!! It's the word on the street ya know......

 

[RademR]

true, but then again all the bad reviews have a good setup for their articles.

 

[Numb1075]

it could be positive: "The Edge is making some "bombastic" noises from the ol' geeetar"

 

[kobayashi]

these are not real.

'this is one album i could have left behind.'

'oddly enough, in spite of its name, this album lacks the vivacious pop which so defined U2's experimental phase of the early 90s.'

-
it's a crazy language!

 

[Salome]

in a sad way I think "Zooropa" might have been their best album title since Rattle & Hum

I prefer their music to their album name picking qualities

 

[rivergoat]

hmmm...

The Unforgettable Fire ??

The Joshua Tree ???

heck, for that matter..

October ????

At least with 'Achtung Baby!' they got it right... how the heck to you make fun of THAT?? It's already a joke!

}~