dazzlingamy
Refugee
great minds think alike!
now, back to flaccid penies.
now, back to flaccid penies.
yolland said:I can think of a (justly) much more famous icon of the beautiful male form who isn't nearly as "sizeable":
U2democrat said:I want to see it in person.
yolland said:Actually the main reason for David's smaller penis is that Michelangelo was emulating classical Greek standards of male beauty, in which smaller penises were preferred.
No, from what I was taught it seems to have been a more generalized preference. At the National Archeological Museum in Athens, which had the largest collection of classical statues I've seen, virtually all of them, including the superbuff gods, war heroes etc. looked like that.Irvine511 said:were smaller penises preferred on all men, or just the "beautiful boy" ideal that David seems to represent?
FitzChivalry said:Many straight guys see each other naked in locker rooms and showers all the time (and I presume) don't even think twice about it.
So I wonder why it would bother them to see full-frontal male nudity on TV or film?
FitzChivalry said:Many straight guys see each other naked in locker rooms and showers all the time (and I presume) don't even think twice about it.
So I wonder why it would bother them to see full-frontal male nudity on TV or film?
Fair enough, except the producers supplying the market in question (mainstream cinema) are mostly male and tend to share your squeamishness; and it's not as if female consumers are going to boycott the status quo product simply because they're personally not interested in yet another titty shot. Most filmgoers in general aren't going to refuse to see an otherwise interesting-sounding movie simply because there won't be nudity in it, so I think it's a bit of a stretch to say that audience preferences alone determine the present tendency towards obligatory titty shots on the one hand, but prudishness about male nudity on the other.A_Wanderer said:I don't and I don't want to watch another mans member at all, it's my preference and my right to choose not to - and if the marketplace also feels the same way and doesn't pitch as much male nudity as female nudity then so be it.
Yes, and women don't walk around locker rooms eagerly ogling each other's breasts either...regardless of sex or sexual orientation, it's not an appropriate environment for staring.CTU2fan said:Men naked in a locker room doesn't equal men seeing each other's penis...trust me, guys will do all they can to avoid a peek, whether it's because they don't want to see or don't want to be caught peeking.
CTU2fan said:
Men naked in a locker room doesn't equal men seeing each other's penis...trust me, guys will do all they can to avoid a peek, whether it's because they don't want to see or don't want to be caught peeking.
A_Wanderer said:I don't and I don't want to watch another mans member at all, it's my preference and my right to choose not to
MrPryck2U said:Well, for any guy that's watched straight porn, seeing an erect penis shouldn't be a big deal at all.
Hell, in that movie SuperBad, there's a whole scene about a straight boy's obsession with erect penises. Very funny scene, btw.