I disagree with whoever said the iPod was the best player out there. Besides being overpriced, the unit locks you into a proprietary DRM'd format and a single music store that has dubious restrictions to begin with. In my experience alone, I feel the iRiver units are much superior. iTunes, while simple to use, lacks basic tools for any serious audiophile.
And, unless you wish to upload straight-up wav files, the player doesn't support far superior and unencumbered formats such as ogg, and lossless shn.
Worse of all though, my player needs to support lossless formats, and the iPod doesn't do this very well. What everybody seems to be taking for granted with this whole "digital music revolution" is the growing evidence of adverse affects on our health and aural systems listening to lossy digital audio can do to the human aural system.
Listening to crisp, clean hi-fi audio is one of the finest pleasures in my life, and I refuse to ruin my aural capacity by subjecting myself to (and even paying for the overpriced priviledge of) lossy DRM'd audio recordings which I can not enjoy and which is in all probability a serious health hazard.
And, unless you wish to upload straight-up wav files, the player doesn't support far superior and unencumbered formats such as ogg, and lossless shn.
Worse of all though, my player needs to support lossless formats, and the iPod doesn't do this very well. What everybody seems to be taking for granted with this whole "digital music revolution" is the growing evidence of adverse affects on our health and aural systems listening to lossy digital audio can do to the human aural system.
Listening to crisp, clean hi-fi audio is one of the finest pleasures in my life, and I refuse to ruin my aural capacity by subjecting myself to (and even paying for the overpriced priviledge of) lossy DRM'd audio recordings which I can not enjoy and which is in all probability a serious health hazard.