U2Man said:
I know this wasn't addressed to me but....
She said I know what it's like to be dead
I know what it is to be sad
And she's making me feel like I've never been born.
I said "Who put all those things in your hair
Things that ake me feel that I'm mad
And you're making me feel like I've never been born."
She said "you don't understand what I said"
I said "No, no, no, you're wrong"
When I was a boy everything was right
Everything was right
I said "Even though you know what you know
I know that I'm ready to leave
'Cause you're making me feel like I've never been born."
She said "you don't understand what I said"
I said "No, no, no, you're wrong"
When I was a boy everything was right
Everything was right
I said "Even though you know what you know
I know that I'm ready to leave
'Cause you're making me feel like I've never been born."
She said I know what it's like to be dead
I know what it is to be sad...
crystal4470 said:Look, no-one in their right mind would compare any band to the Beatles, at this moment.
both bands have a unique sound.
The Beatles tore up the 60's era with countless number one songs all over the world. U2 haven't done that.
I ask the question whether anyone on this forum has every been to a U2 concert where you couldn't here the band perform over the screaming female crowd.
Don't get me wrong i love U2. I have been a fan since 1981.
Maybe this is the debate we all should be having in another 20 years time.
STING2 said:many people consider Joshua Tree or Achtung Baby to be superior to any Beatles album.
VertigoGal said:seriously? your name has long mystified me my friend...the answer has been staring me in the face all along.
VertigoGal said:
I think Vertigo is a decent but not extroardinary song, and I hate the term "gal"...hence my name.
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=mo786&word2=my+ballsmo786 said:U2 beat the Beatles in a googlefight - if that is not definitive then I don't know what is!
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=u2&word2=beatles
typhoon said:
crystal4470 said:STING2 I actually said they have more number ones world wide. U2 may have had more number ones in ireland but in australia, where i live, they have only had about 5 number ones. Whereas, the beatles have, and don't quote me on this, at least 20 odd.
So to compare bands like the beatles and u2 you need to look at the whole world performance not just the country that you live in.
Any way - both bands are, as i stated before, unique in their own way. And this is a really old debate and it should be put to bed!!!!!
i know, lets compare u2 to the Police/Sting. been around in the same era.