US Politics XXXVII: hiiiii Kevin, I’m your biggest fan!

The friendliest place on the web for anyone that follows U2.
If you have answers, please help by responding to the unanswered posts.
Status
Not open for further replies.
i have literally seen co-workers court-martialed and even put in military prison for infractions far less egregious than even what biden is accused of, much less trump.

This absolutely happens. Information integrity and security is a main pillar in every annual training requirement, and they aren't joking.

The goal is for our high-ranking politicians to be held to the same standard they also swore an oath to. In the real world they aren't held to the same standard. It's not even close...we're about to see it demonstrated again on two new cases.

Nothing new under the sun.
 
I’m actually willing to call it a wash with the classified documents issue. My hunch of that on both sides, 90% of it is accidental. Trump should still be charged with obstruction though.
 
I’m actually willing to call it a wash with the classified documents issue. My hunch of that on both sides, 90% of it is accidental. Trump should still be charged with obstruction though.



Of course it’s accidental, and at worst perhaps arrogant (thinking it’s okay because they are special). Also note though that Clinton’s improperly handled records were communications that originated with her. Trump’s (and presumably Biden’s) were records from other agencies that needed to be either appropriately stored or destroyed accordingly. On all three counts, I’d question one’s ability to continue doing their job (grounds for dismissal). On one count (Clinton) there is an issue of habitual non-compliance. On another count (Trump), there was defiant refusal to return the records and had to have them forcefully returned. Enter Biden, whose offense sounds like an in between of these two (improper storage of non-originating material, but without obstruction).

Anyways, in any of these cases, grounds for termination is fair, but each is subject to a review given the special circumstances of each of their roles. Hence the special counsel.

I’m totally fine if the wash is “none of the three of them ever run again.” But fuck that, I’m not gonna listen to some noise saying all three have done the same thing.

The literal NUMBER ONE thing you’re ALWAYS told to do in the IC is to CONFESS if you fuck up. Walk into the SCIF with a phone? It’s wrong but it’s okay if you REPORT YOURSELF. Get caught with your phone in the SCIF? Probably still okay… unless you start trying to deny that it happened. That’s when you are going to get fired, because the number one thing not to do is to make a boldfaced lie.
 
This is like there is a serial killer on the loose and he's killed 50 people and the other guy accidentally ran over a squirrel and now they are both at the same level of criminal.
 
Of course it’s accidental, and at worst perhaps arrogant (thinking it’s okay because they are special).

Some of our pols do think they're special, and we go along with it. Voting in the incumbent most of the time. $ome for many decade$.

Not sure what makes you confident either of the dual document dust-ups are accidental.

Is all the evidence in?

Will congressional oversight be okay?
 
Some of our pols do think they're special, and we go along with it. Voting in the incumbent most of the time. $ome for many decade$.



Not sure what makes you confident either of the dual document dust-ups are accidental.



Is all the evidence in?



Will congressional oversight be okay?



Ok, say they’re not accidental. In such a case, I have the least confidence that Trump, of all three names, to not have nefarious or egregious intent.

But what makes me so confident? Understanding the vast complexity of their operation in executive office. They’re nth dimensionally nested, with aides who have aides who have aides. They likely have hundreds of thousands if not millions of discretized sources of protected materials they go through throughout their tenure in office, where they individually never actually longer a finger on or point an eye at said material. Knowing there’s a whole system that exists outside of their tenure that they have to basically legally circumvent by exception, and knowing there is little to no backbone for transfer of power (i.e. there is no apolitical groundskeeper with close ties to every presidency and the practice of unique security of materials must be re-invented every time someone new comes into power)… yeah, the odds of fucking up are quite high. Could they also be doing something sly and playing a political game? FOR SURE. That’s probably the second highest likelihood, followed by individual political corruption for personal gain. But what evidence do we have for either of the latter two?
 
It’s entirely plausible to me that Trump obstructed justice and lied to the DOJ in order to hang on to the documents so that he could show them off to his fake rich friends and give him a whatever sense of leverage he needs in his always purely transactional interactions with human beings.

I’m sure she’d monetize if given the opportunity, but for him, the whole “you wanna see something really cool?” Thing seems entirely consistent with his 13-year old boy personality.
 
Spurred By Ukraine, Massive Munitions Restocking Plan In Proposed Pentagon Budget
https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zo...s-restocking-plan-in-proposed-pentagon-budget

The new spending plan comes as the Pentagon is examining ways to ensure the U.S. has enough weaponry to fight its own battles, especially as concerns grow about a potential conflict with China over Taiwan, while maintaining support for Ukraine.

"We are going through a study, an analysis right now, to ensure that our war plans, our contingency plans, which we have multiples around the world in different theaters, to make sure that we've done the right math, the right estimates," Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milley said at an event on Tuesday, according to Reuters.

....The amount of weaponry provided to Ukraine and U.S. allies has strained the Pentagon’s ability to procure enough of some of these systems, thanks to a combination of budget crunches, reduced emphasis on them during 20 years of a counterterrorism fight in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere and a cumbersome supply chain, something you can read more about here.

Given all those concerns, the amount of time it will take to actually get these items into supply depots remains unknown, given the long procurement lead time and a defense industrial base already struggling to cope with demand. Expanding the ability to produce high-tech weaponry is very costly and anything but a quick process.

.....The war is now largely a grinding slog with few major territorial gains and increasing losses in personnel and equipment on both sides. Ukraine, however, is intent on pressing the gains it has made in the south and east, with an eye toward even retaking the Crimean peninsula Russia has occupied since 2014.

Its chances of succeeding in those endeavors would be greatly diminished with any significant reduction in aid from the U.S. and allies, so we will continue to watch how all this plays out.
 
Losing GOP candidate arrested in string of shootings at New Mexico Democrats' homes
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...hootings-new-mexico-democrats-homes-rcna66027

After the continued embracing by the GOP of election denial and a president who encouraged violence (any guess on how many incidents can be drawn back directly to Trump?)

here's a NBC News story worth considering.

A failed New Mexico state House candidate described by police as an "election denier" was arrested Monday in a string of shootings at the homes of state and local Democratic leaders.

Republican Solomon Peña is accused of conspiring with and paying four men to carry out four non-injury shootings at the Albuquerque-area homes of two Bernalillo County commissioners and two state legislators, Albuquerque police said.

Peña might have been motivated by anger over his November loss, police said. Police spokesperson Gilbert Gallegos said at a news conference early Monday evening that Peña alleged his defeat was the result of election fraud.

Pena lost his state House challenge to incumbent Democrat Miguel P. Garcia by 5,679 to 2,033, or 74% to 26%.

He took his case to three county commissioners and a state senator — some whose homes were targeted in the shootings — to no avail, Gallegos said.

"He had complaints about his election he felt being rigged," Gallegos said. "As the mayor said, he was an election denier — he doesn’t want to accept the results of his election."
 
Losing GOP candidate arrested in string of shootings at New Mexico Democrats' homes
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...hootings-new-mexico-democrats-homes-rcna66027

After the continued embracing by the GOP of election denial and a president who encouraged violence (any guess on how many incidents can be drawn back directly to Trump?)

here's a NBC News story worth considering.



Whether it’s Democrats shadow banning anti-vaxxers, or Republicans shooting opponents, both sides have a lot to answer for.
 
So about that...

Santos’s Lies Were Known to Some Well-Connected Republicans

George Santos inspired no shortage of suspicion during his 2022 campaign, including in the upper echelons of his own party, yet many Republicans looked the other way.


By*Nicholas Fandos

Jan. 13, 2023

In late 2021, as he prepared to make a second run for a suburban New York City House seat, George Santos gave permission for his campaign to commission a routine background study on him.

Campaigns frequently rely on this kind of research, known as vulnerability studies, to identify anything problematic that an opponent might seize on. But when the report came back on Mr. Santos, the findings by a Washington research firm were far more startling, suggesting a pattern of deception that cut to the heart of the image he had cultivated as a wealthy financier.

Some of Mr. Santos’s own vendors were so alarmed after seeing the study in late November 2021 that they urged him to drop out of the race, and warned that he could risk public humiliation by continuing. When Mr. Santos disputed key findings and vowed to continue running, members of the campaign team quit, according to three of the four people The New York Times spoke to with knowledge of the study.

The episode, which has not been previously reported, is the most explicit evidence to date that a small circle of well-connected Republican campaign professionals had indications far earlier than the public that Mr. Santos was spinning an elaborate web of deceits, and that the candidate himself had been warned about just how vulnerable those lies were to unraveling.

The Republicans knew. Spineless weasel Kevin McCarthy just put the guy on committees even after the public knew. Being a complete fraud isn't an issue for the Trumpism GOP. it's not a bug, it's a feature.

The real question is how, in some of the most populated suburbs in America, in the shadow of the media capital of the nation, that this didn't become the huge issue it is now prior to election day.

It's but another failing of our news media.
 
As ever, I think *both sides* have a lot to answer for. The Republicans for knowingly running a fraud and possible Russian spy and for then giving him positions of Confressional power, and the Democrats for not stopping the Republicans from doing these things.
 
Mr. Santos was a drag queen in Brazil ? If true does that force GQP to expel him? Not the billions of lies and illegal fraud activity….
 
Ms Carroll, 79, has sued Mr Trump for both sexual assault and for defamation after he said in a 2019 interview with 'The Hill' that she was "totally lying" and simply trying to market her book.

In the 19 October deposition, Mr Trump repeated his oft-made claim that he could not have pursued or raped her in the changing rooms at the Bergdorf Goodman store because he is not attracted to women who look like Ms Carroll.

"I'll say it with great respect. Number one, she's not my type. Number two, it never happened," he said.

Asked directly in the deposition about the alleged incident, he repeated the statement.

"Physically she's not my type, and now that I've gotten indirectly to hear things about her, she wouldn't be my type in any way, shape, or form."

But when he was shown a picture of himself with Ms Carroll and others at a reception in the 1990s, Mr Trump said, "That's Marla, that's my wife," before being corrected by his own attorney.

something something fentanyl something something
 
It’s really remarkable to me how much new Twitter is pushing conservatives. I’ve always read conservative writers. Always. Going back to blogs and the relatively early days of the internet. It was important to me. I follow a few conservatives on Twitter, and often find myself rabbit-holing because it’s fascinating to watch the conservative hive-mind at work.

My feed is now more than 50% conservative posts, and not people I follow but random who are followed by people I follow. This does not happen with the liberals I follow.

I do not follow Matt fucking Walsh, but he is all over my screen tonight.
 
It’s really remarkable to me how much new Twitter is pushing conservatives. I’ve always read conservative writers. Always. Going back to blogs and the relatively early days of the internet. It was important to me. I follow a few conservatives on Twitter, and often find myself rabbit-holing because it’s fascinating to watch the conservative hive-mind at work.

My feed is now more than 50% conservative posts, and not people I follow but random who are followed by people I follow. This does not happen with the liberals I follow.

I do not follow Matt fucking Walsh, but he is all over my screen tonight.

Yeah, you now literally have to switch to the "following" tab every time you're on Twitter now. Otherwise I have tweets from Ted Cruz and Jim Jordan at the top of my feed every time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom