With ZooTV, they built the crazy stage out of the artistic/thematic ideas of information- and media-overload. It worked. With Vertigo stadium shows, there was no theme, so the stage design was built for appearance and sound. It worked. With the 360Tour, the stage design was started 3 years before the album came out, designed for experience, and a theme was loosely tacked on. I'm on the fence about whether it works or not. The superficial theme of the stage being a spaceship kind of works fine, but I feel like for many the deeper theme of the crowd traveling as one body; transported to some other place by the band; respect and awe for the Earth (?)----I'm not sure if that deeper theme really kicks in.
The shows are fantastic, nevertheless. Does this ad hoc application of a theme have an impact at all? Is it effective? Does it matter?
I felt this light show and screen shots are the most boring in recent tours. Not enough art and graphics just shots of band. There are a few great moments UF and CBL and Blue Room If lucky enought to have it played but not what you expect for a screen that large etc,
I enjoyed last tour with the 4 individual screens to watch each member and using the light strings for effect. Zoo Tv and Pop had much better visuals. Remember the screen shots during HMKMKM and the graphics of Zoo....
I feel they plan and develop for 4 years but since they dont have it in time to rehearse it is more a work in progress. Hopefully they will mix it up better next year.
I liked radioheads last tour with individual cameras on each member with the light poles creating an incredible visual that made show more moving.
Or Pink Floyds use in 70"s.. All graphics no band shots...
Could you imagine Bono not having his face on screen all night????