George W. Bush Does Not Walk On Water

[z edge]

Lemonite, you really need to email me @ Z69edge@aol.com

[Clark W. Griswold, Jr]

Originally posted by melon:

You can live in a fantasy world without "welfare," but, statistically, you will be a "welfare recipient" yourself if you get unemployed and claim unemployment benefits, or if you get old enough to claim Social Security and Medicare.

I don't think you can equate receiving unemployment, social security, or medicare with receiving welfare. You have to pay in to these programs before benefiting from them. Welfare's only prerequisites are incompetance and laziness.

[LOVE MUSCLE]

Originally posted by Clark W. Griswold, Jr:
I don't think you can equate receiving unemployment, social security, or medicare with receiving welfare. You have to pay in to these programs before benefiting from them. Welfare's only prerequisites are incompetance and laziness.

Good one D!



------------------
Hi

[z edge]

Originally posted by erper:

im Libertarian, i dont see things in a bipolar fashion like the media brainwashes us to believe in only a 2 party system...

to hell with that... both republicans and democrats, that are in power, are part of the same country club who look after their own even if they are in another party.

[

Whats the name of that country club again??

I'd like to go check this one out!
*imagines going to a country club and seeing both Dick's Gephart and Cheney sitting at the same table throwing back a few while Colin Powell and Senator Daschle play pool as President Bush dances with Hillary Clinton and Monica Lewinsky tabledances for Ted Kennedy, Don Rumsfeld, and his "boys"*

[cloudimani]

But having said that, no, he can't walk on water. I think he'd have trouble finding the lake, then when he does he'd get pissed off that he can't walk on it, then entirely blame the lake, apparently without even realising that half of the reason why he can't walk on it is his problem, not the lakes.
[/B]

Faced with the problem of the lake, George has two options:
1. Spend millions of $ on a super icing machine that will freeeze the lake and kill lots of wildlife, and doubtless cut down many trees and destory natural habitats, so he can walk on it. Because he can.
2. Drain the damn lake, with pretty much the above consequences, and again, becaus he can.



------------------
Blame it on the little guy...WITH ONE EYE!!!

°*~darkcloud~*°

[erper]

compromise is good, but not when it involves lying and theft.." in the name of the common good" we hereby volunteer you to fork over half your money so we can give it to this person or entity.

besides when the president compromises to prove he's being president to all constituents... look to see who he's actually compromising with.... he's arguing with other politicians on how best to spend our money. they dont argue over whether or not to reduce the amount they spend.. it always grows and grows... thats why repubs in power are no different than demos...

[Lemonite]

Originally posted by cloudimani:
Faced with the problem of the lake, George has two options:
1. Spend millions of $ on a super icing machine that will freeeze the lake and kill lots of wildlife, and doubtless cut down many trees and destory natural habitats, so he can walk on it. Because he can.
2. Drain the damn lake, with pretty much the above consequences, and again, becaus he can.

Joke all you want, just remember this thread next time ya'll liberals try and accuse us of blindly following W without any investigation into his policies/stances on issues..

L.Unplugged

[Lilly]

Originally posted by Lemonite:

1. My political affiliation has no bearing on anything whatsoever in this thread.. All that matters is that there are issues I disagree with George W. on, to refute the claims and statements by many liberals in this forum that I and other republicans follow W with a blind eye in a Pied Piper fashion.

2. Oh the days of High School..

L.Unplugged

1. Oh, I see the importance of this thread now....to congatulate you on having an independent thought? YAY! HOORAY FOR LEMONITE! HE CAN THINK BY HIMSELF!! I got that picture, you didn't get mine. What I'm saying is what was the purpose of mentioning this? You're telling us that you can think for yourself and disagree with our President even though he's in your party? Again, congrats to that.

2. So, I was the childish one for dubbing you Captain Conservative (which was in sarcasm might I add, but that is a difficult thing to convey over the internet) right? Is that what you're saying? 'Cos this isn't childish at all...

------------------
Proud owner, maker and baker of THE U2 cookies.

[Lemonite]

Originally posted by Lilly:
1. Oh, I see the importance of this thread now....to congatulate you on having an independent thought?

Geezus.. You just don't want to see the issue at hand.. This is not a back patting issue, It never was, I'm sorry you have failed to see that.. I've explained my reason for this thread multiple times above, If you cannot see it, I will say a prayer for you because there is no subterfuge here or any game playing, I'm pointing out a contradiction made by liberals about us Conservatives in regards to W Bush, to give them pause the next time we are accused for 'Blindly following W as if he can do no wrong.'

That's the issue, It's a shame you don't want to see it that way, because that is the only way it is in this thread.

L. Unplugged