Steved1998
Rock n' Roll Doggie
No sir, I don't like it.
Loved the original
Loved the original
Isn't there something, specially in the beginning, that reminds of the Temple Bar mix of WGRYWH?
Yes, I'm really glad we have both versions since I like elements of both of them
Bono's vocal take is better and more emocional. But maybe too much. [Is it just my impression or Bono clearly goes out of tune in the "so glad you made it..." line around 4:00?]
1) The piano chords in the beginning in a different speed of the rest of the song;
2) The abrupt end of the strings at the end of the song. I thought it's clear that this song needed some kind of fade out, given the elements that make the outro;
3) The forced new transition between chorus and verse. It doesn't work and it seems out of place;
4) The operatic choir singing belonged obviously at the ending of a song like this, with lyrics like this. Why was it moved to the bridge section?
If it wins the Oscar, I'd say it's got a pretty good chance.I wonder if they'll play it live???
I hope so.If it wins the Oscar, I'd say it's got a pretty good chance.
The more I listen to the Brothers version, the more it seems bizarre and non-cohesive for me. Starting on the impression that some of the tracks were recorded many time ago, some others more recently and mixed together now, like a single version... but not in a good way.
Bono's vocal take is better and more emocional. But maybe too much. [Is it just my impression or Bono clearly goes out of tune in the "so glad you made it..." line around 4:00?]
I don't get the purpose of:
1) The piano chords in the beginning in a different speed of the rest of the song;
2) The abrupt end of the strings at the end of the song. I thought it's clear that this song needed some kind of fade out, given the elements that make the outro;
3) The forced new transition between chorus and verse. It doesn't work and it seems out of place;
4) The operatic choir singing belonged obviously at the ending of a song like this, with lyrics like this. Why was it moved to the bridge section?
I still think that the Linear version could sound like a demo, but it just needed some improvements. I like Brothers version but it sounds forced and mixes too much evocations of other songs ("The Hands That Built America", "...Wild Horses" Temple Bar mix, Zooropa's/Passengers' strings sections) not necessarily in the most cohesive way. It always sounds like a song that existed and that had to be transformed with certain purposes (which is the case, in fact).
I don't see the problem with it (it seems that dan_smee does and obviously has to refute it, 'cause it still seems he chases it). Almost every other U2 has been dissected too.Don't take it the wrong way, if it was somebody else I would write the same.:
Do we really need to dissect every little aspect in every song?
Does a "clean" audio version of this new cut exist yet?
And the outro? I love it. I love the Edge riff and I love the deep background vocals.
^I wish brilliant YouTube users were clicking on that one, instead of my first one with that crap audience recording.
And Y2K, leave your email address and one of us can send you the mp3!