Ok. If you think 1 is a reason, then you have issues with TUF, JT, AB, Pop, and ATYCLB. Dont think having the band on the cover automatically makes it suck.
2 is legitimate, but points towards boring rather than crapness.
3 holds for JT and ATYCLB as well
4 emphasize to me the directness of the songs, the painting in "primary colors". So it suits the material IMO.
5,6,8. Agree, they look sort of weird, but there's a bit of mischief in everyone, which makes it a cut above ATYCLB
10. If you waited 4 years dreaming about the fucking album cover, I really haven't much to say
9,11-already dealt with
12 - So you'd have a picture of Little Man and Fat Boy on there?
2 is legitimate, but points towards boring rather than crapness.
3 holds for JT and ATYCLB as well
4 emphasize to me the directness of the songs, the painting in "primary colors". So it suits the material IMO.
5,6,8. Agree, they look sort of weird, but there's a bit of mischief in everyone, which makes it a cut above ATYCLB
10. If you waited 4 years dreaming about the fucking album cover, I really haven't much to say
9,11-already dealt with
12 - So you'd have a picture of Little Man and Fat Boy on there?