I disagree. I think with the number of songs rehearsed, and the "no opening act" means we will get the longest shows they have done.
Given how successful Sweetest Thing was as a single in 1998, I'm stunned it hasn't been played live more often. I'm not the biggest fan of the song but it's about time it came back to the setlist.
For the start of the tour, I think we could see shorter sets (110 min) as opposed to longer ones. Remember, Bono has had to go through intense rehab for his injuries, plus he had the whole back issue on the last tour, plus he's turning 55 on Sunday. They would probably be smart to start on the shorter side (much to our frustration), then to bust out 2 1/2 hours on opening night and then find out he can't handle it.
As for no opening acts. I don't think it's a time thing.
For the start of the tour, I think we could see shorter sets (110 min) as opposed to longer ones. Remember, Bono has had to go through intense rehab for his injuries, plus he had the whole back issue on the last tour, plus he's turning 55 on Sunday. They would probably be smart to start on the shorter side (much to our frustration), then to bust out 2 1/2 hours on opening night and then find out he can't handle it.
Maybe they should have a small Edge section of the show to give Bono a bit of an extra break along with the intermission. The band could do Numb, Van Diemen's Land, hell Edge could even play October.
It's like when the new Star Wars movie comes out (I'm not a fan personally). I can't imagine the die hard fans bitching that the movie wasn't long enough. As long as the content is great and mind-blowing, that's all that matters.
As for no opening acts. I don't think it's a time thing. I just don't think that they want other roadies and musicians tinkering around on this new state of the art stage and using the screens and technology in advance of U2 taking the stage.
by that theory they wouldn't have had opening acts for 360, Popmart or ZooTV either.
i don't buy the age thing. they are old for a rock group when it comes to playing on the radio, they are not old for a rock group performing live.
do i think they're going to break out 3+ hour long springsteen-like sets (he's 66, btw)? no. but i would certainly expect at least 2 1/2 hours out of them, especially for the prices they're charging.
we'll see how it plays out over the next week.
Call me crazy but I think almost everything on the new record is much better than this. In fact maybe everything on the new record is better. I never cared for The Sweetest Thing. I need to hear it live about as badly as I need to hear SIAMYCGOO and In a Little While again. Which means not at all.
You are sounding less excited by the minute
Sent from my iPhone using U2 Interference
When you come out of a great U2 show, you can literally feel drained, physically and emotionally.
Nah not at all.
I'm still quite excited... I'm just a little surprised that the sets are coming in under 2 hours, especially when there's no opener and they've rehearsed so many songs.
I'm expecting a longer set come Thursday.
Actually I feel rather uplifted.
Actually I feel rather uplifted.
It's on Tuesday. Have a feeling the Rogers Arena will have much tighter security.Think we will see next Wednesday when the radio winners get in, think that will be the real show
As for Springsteen, I can't picture his fans camped out reporting dress rehearsal setlists minute by minute.
Indeed. It's hard to stump them.That's cos him & his band are capable of pulling just about anything at any time, is that right?
Indeed. It's hard to stump them.
That's cos him & his band are capable of pulling just about anything at any time, is that right?