Nobody has to agree with me whatsoever, and if you don't see it as hate or defamation, you're entitled to believe that.
I on the other hand think that "art" is a piss poor excuse to squeeze in the most despecable, perverse commotions, and amplifying via horrible drawings the idea that it is okay, even patriotic, to assassinate the president. I'm not crying for the cretins. If they get banned, it's their own fault. You can push all the tasteless garbage you want and claim art or freedom of speech, but I draw the line when it is nothing but hate and utter lunacy, possibly something the DNC would even reject. (that last part was a hint of sarcasm, okay, back on topic.) Do I believe art should be censored? Only very rarely. They can have their anti-Bush pot party, but I don't blame secret service at all. May the scum of the earth eat their words.