rootedphoenix
The Fly
Hm. Dystopian future. Unless you hate humanity.I'm guessing it's a world where humanity is extinct, and big fucking salty ballz roam the earth.
Hm. Dystopian future. Unless you hate humanity.I'm guessing it's a world where humanity is extinct, and big fucking salty ballz roam the earth.
Edge and Bono were clearly the more disappointing band members on NLOTH. Adam was kicking ass and getting high on winning the whole time.
They are going to release something.
It's only a question of how many songs, in my mind.
Don't believe me? Put together one legitimate reason they'd work with DM in late '10 and early '11 and then sit on it for (at least) two years. I don't think you can.
And if you can't...then we know U2 is not oblivious.
We'll get songs (hopefully more than one - scratch that - hopefully more than eight).
Dropping Danger Mouse is the worst thing worst U2 can do if they want to stay "relevant".
Dropping Danger Mouse is the worst thing worst U2 can do if they want to stay "relevant".
see also Nellee Hooper, Chris Thomas, and Rick Rubin
All three are different.
Nellee Hooper only moved on because U2 were taking too long, and he had another large, un-shiftable commitment. Chris Thomas was to Atomic Bomb as Eno/Lanois are to this. Meaning, they began in one direction with one producer, shifted direction and shifted producer. They started this album with a foundation of stuff done with Eno/Lanois, and somewhere along the line it changes, and they're finishing it with Danger Mouse.
Rick Rubin - The intention of that session was always just to be a bit of mutual feeling each other out. They didn't go into that to make an album at all. Perhaps only happened at all because they had a couple of things they needed to do (Saints + U218 extra track), and I wouldn't mind guessing it was specifically him tapped for the job because his style/'sound' would be a good match for the potentially messy mixing of two bands on Saints. But he is who he is, and they've thought about him before, now they've got him, and they've got a bit of time, why not mess around a bit and see how it goes? Went so-so, so what?
They didn't leave the Hooper or Thomas material aside though - we've got Pop and Atomic Bomb. Rubin yes, but it was a different thing.
Obviously, I get what you're saying though. This is U2. It would definitely surprise me now though, given how far they've gone with Danger Mouse. Not just a couple of weeks of messing around, as per Rubin. If it wasn't working, or didn't feel right, it would have been dropped or shifted on some time ago.
That would be brilliant and would create an insane amount of hype.they should do a launch on the first SA tour date and do a download-only release at that time. live nation wouldn't care.
put the URL up on the video screen for all to download. then people will tweet about it and all hell will break loose.
they should do a launch on the first SA tour date and do a download-only release at that time. live nation wouldn't care.
put the URL up on the video screen for all to download. then people will tweet about it and all hell will break loose.
My guess is that we won't see something until next year, or the year after that.
They're probably being very careful, after the way their last two albums were taken critically.
"Can we land the 747 in Times Square?"
Winner
It's this year in my mind. Earnie Shavers has a unique take on it and that's my forecast as well. In too deep to drop out now. They need to take advantage of 360 and its publicity as well. Not shut the whole thing down for 18 months after 360 ends, only to resurface older, fatter, and less "relevant" in the attention deficit world we live in with a new Get on Your Vertigo type single. I have a shaky faith that there is a plan. Otherwise, what a freakin cock-up.