as you wish16 said:I don't get what all the fuss about OOTS is. It's a good song, but it's not a 10/10, and it's certainly not the best song on the album. To me, the song that never seems to get enough attention is Crumbs From Your Table. It's one of those rare songs that I loved at first, and yet, it's also a grower. It has grown into my favorite song on a VERY deep album. But OOTS is very Beatle/Oasis ISH to me, and certainly not groundbreaking.
U2_Guy said:
Original is definetely NOT groundbreaking.
My friends says it sounds like an Aerosmith song.
I think it's a song who could have been made by many bands like Aerosmith, Beatles, Bon Jovi... It's bland and generic.
I
innocent_eyes said:I actually think 'sometimes' would have been better left on the cd as a part of the story, only U2 fans should see inside and only they would undertand.
I don't see much appeal for 'sometimes' as a single to the general public who don't know the story behind the song...
Sleep Over Jack said:
Yes yes...lets lump the Beatles in with awful crud like Aerosmith and Bon Jovi..they were experimental masters, not bland and generic AT ALL!
Some people....
PowerSurge said:Afterall, Where the streets have no name is one of U2's signature songs, but how many non U2 fans (as you put it) know that the song is about Heavan?